Sep 2019
10:34am, 27 Sep 2019
15,279 posts
|
Chrisull
Andrew Adonis (who is probably less forensic that either Maugham or Dag) is also a good one and he was debunking almost immediately. David Henig and Matthew Holehouse are two good ones in the field for the trade stuff.
|
Sep 2019
10:37am, 27 Sep 2019
5,306 posts
|
jda
I wouldn't trust Adonis for precision actually (too much of a politician, policy-based-evidence type), though Henig also good.
|
Sep 2019
10:59am, 27 Sep 2019
2,292 posts
|
J2R
Another Twitter tip - Dmitry Grozoubinski. Skewers nonsense on trade very swiftly.
|
Sep 2019
11:14am, 27 Sep 2019
2,296 posts
|
TomahawkMike
Cummings is looking a bit smug "we are going to win". It does make you wonder what they have up their sleeves but then again this bluster about obeying the law but doing the opposite may be a ploy to get the opposition to spend valuable time scrabbling around for a way to preempt this instead of doing something sensible. I thought once they came back from the pro-rogue we might see some new bills coming forward from the opposition to further lock down Blowjo. Nothing on the horizon yet. I think they need to get off their backsides and get moving. It's looking like one of those ceasefires where one side is niavely waiting and the other busy plotting.
|
Sep 2019
11:28am, 27 Sep 2019
12,151 posts
|
richmac
^ I think the smugness is a bit of a rouse to try to put the 'opposition' of. Plus that Cummings is such a smarmy bastard it's a permanent sneer.
|
Sep 2019
12:43pm, 27 Sep 2019
15,276 posts
|
Bazoaxe
It saddens me that Cummings it talking about winning and losing. That shouldn't be what this is all about. It should be about doing what is best for the country as a whole. If only he could come out and honestly tell us why it will be better for us if he 'wins. |
Sep 2019
12:47pm, 27 Sep 2019
8,188 posts
|
simbil
Happy, politico newsletter has the 3 scenarios politico.eu
|
Sep 2019
1:01pm, 27 Sep 2019
24,144 posts
|
Wriggling Snake
Baz. One of the problems right back to day 0 back in 2016 was the language of winning and losing, rather than talking factually about what is best. Cummings didn't mention how or when. Brexit is going to happen. It is about how. |
|
Sep 2019
1:17pm, 27 Sep 2019
5,308 posts
|
jda
I wonder if you are more or less confident about that prediction than you were earlier in the year when you were telling us we were heading for no deal in March, WS?
|
|
Sep 2019
1:48pm, 27 Sep 2019
15,283 posts
|
Chrisull
Another +1 for Grozoubinski. Also may I add Frances Coppola @Frances_Coppola And secondly on riots BBC pundit (Brendan O'Neil - yes I know he's a gobshite), calling for riots on air: twitter.com Backing up Joris Bonson's implicit threat: thetimes.co.uk Interesting point here I came across on Twitter, on violence: a) violence is predominantly a young man's game b) the Remain demographic is predominantly young, and WAY younger than leave. I'd politely point out Brexiteers, do you really want to go there? Are you 65 year olds really gonna be manning the barricades? I suggest not. |
Useful Links
FE accepts no responsibility for external links. Or anything, really.Related Threads
-
Fantasy General Election
Jul 2024
-
EU Referendum - In or Out? Vote here
Aug 2018
-
March to Parliament Against Brexit - Sat 2nd July
Jun 2016
-
EU Referendum
Feb 2016
-
Ads on Fetch - anyone else getting Leave and Remain?!
Feb 2017
-
The Environment Thread :-)
Sep 2024
-
Economics
Aug 2023
-
Dear Scottish Fetchies
Jan 2023
-
Any economists out there - question
Oct 2022
-
Power and exploitation - please check my sanity
Oct 2018
