The Environment Thread :-)
58 watchers
7 Nov
12:36pm, 7 Nov 2024
6,607 posts
|
Groundhog
I have been involved in a battery storage project in west Wales, but just design feasibility. They can be quite big with many containerised battery units so they take up a big area. They might be sighted near solar farms or wind turbines which can also be quite close to existing infrastructure such as sub-stations or former coal fired power stations now demolished. They can be a source of noise nuisance apparently (cooling fans?) and the BESS I looked at had a lot of noise wall fencing in amongst the units and environmental bunds around it to shield it from view and reduce noise.
|
7 Nov
12:42pm, 7 Nov 2024
4,188 posts
|
cackleberry
I think for ours, the substation is also being built on site at the same time and the proposal notice does have an FAQ about noise which talks about screens of trees. One of my running buds is currently working on a similar project in the North East. |
7 Nov
1:09pm, 7 Nov 2024
28,239 posts
|
Dvorak
Several such are proposed in the Scottish Borders and there is afaik fairly vigorous local opposition, largely on the grounds of "the industrialisation of the countryside". As it's related to the cross-border superconnector there also an element of "England gets the benefit, Scotland gets the pain" A technical question I don't know the answer to: is it possible to stack these, in the manner of a multi-storey carpark? I can see there would be issues, like the necessary construction and probably a lot of concrete (and the cost, of course) but it could cut down the footprint a lot. I also wonder if many mini-sites would be a feasible alternative to mega-sites? |
8 Nov
1:20am, 8 Nov 2024
22,503 posts
|
Gooner
They can't be stacked more than they are at present for fire safety regulations. Though the risks of issues are low.
|
8 Nov
12:46pm, 8 Nov 2024
23,393 posts
|
rf_fozzy
On the subject of infrastructure in the UK and RE, this has been an interesting listen with some nuanced debates from some interesting stakeholders: bbc.co.uk
|
20 Nov
4:57pm, 20 Nov 2024
5,392 posts
|
run free
HappyG(rrr) wrote: You've lost me there 3M. With no changes to behaviour, just fewer humans, the planet would benefit. We are the main cause of planetary damage? Change in behaviour is ALSO required, totally agree. G Going back some pages, found a simple tool that helps to visualise the population and emissions and by person explore.populationmatters.org |
Useful Links
FE accepts no responsibility for external links. Or anything, really.- why Kodak completely missed the boat when it came to digital cameras
- rf_fozzy: This is quite a good article about how disruptive technology work
- run free's Grand Designs example Ben Laws is a man who built his dream
- Carbon Commentary carboncommentary.com
- UK ombudsman for problems with electricity or gas
Related Threads
-
Ethical choices
Apr 2021
-
Electric car anyone?
Nov 2024
-
Solar pv and other domestic micro-generation technologies
Oct 2024
-
Reusable/collapsible water cups
Oct 2024
-
Reducing single-use/disposable plastic
Sep 2024
-
The Green Runners
Apr 2024
-
Today I will consume mindfully...
Apr 2024
-
Journey to Zero Waste
Jan 2024
-
Greta Thunberg - JFK for the Climate Generation?
Oct 2022
-
Preventing Food Waste Ideas
Dec 2021