Aug 2020
10:03pm, 22 Aug 2020
19,380 posts
|
flanker
if you know the absolute rate after two minutes and the rate allied with your exercise's last data point, the drop can be worked out.
Or am I misunderstanding? It's literally years since I looked at the .FIT file data, and I think that was before you could get a Garmin to read HRV (even with the old hack).
|
Aug 2020
10:11pm, 22 Aug 2020
12,692 posts
|
Badger
No misunderstanding, that’s exactly right.
|
Aug 2020
12:38am, 23 Aug 2020
19,381 posts
|
flanker
So it's not a matter of not having the data there, just a matter of presentation. Which is an altogether easier problem to solve if someone was so minded.
Maybe Mr Fetch could be persuaded, seeing as he already pulls out the HR data.
|
Aug 2020
2:29am, 23 Aug 2020
30,994 posts
|
SPR
Yeah, that's what I was saying earlier. TBH even without the calculation, you know whether the recovery was decent based on the rate shown.
|
Aug 2020
10:12am, 23 Aug 2020
7,137 posts
|
Sigh
Waited for my recovery HR this morning. 46, from a max of 178 at the end. No idea if that is good, bad or indifferent!
|
Aug 2020
10:42am, 23 Aug 2020
9,692 posts
|
chunkywizard
I always think 40s good, 50s excellent, 60s god like with my max of 172.
|
Aug 2020
10:45am, 23 Aug 2020
7,138 posts
|
Sigh
Thanks CW, that helps.
|
Aug 2020
10:48am, 23 Aug 2020
9,694 posts
|
chunkywizard
It obviously depends on how hard you were pushing as well as your max. I only look after race-type efforts where I am pushing hard.
|
Aug 2020
10:50am, 23 Aug 2020
7,139 posts
|
Sigh
Virtual 5 mile race, ended only 2bpm off max. Makes sense that it's more relevant after hard efforts.
|
Aug 2020
10:55am, 23 Aug 2020
31,005 posts
|
SPR
I think I'd be the opposite TBH. If I'm racing I don't really care, I know I've pushed hard, I'm going to need a decent bit of recovery. I want to see that I recovery well from easy and moderate efforts for consistent training.
|