Hi ,
It looks like you're using an ad blocker.



The revenue generated from the adverts on the site is a critical part of our funding - and it's because of these ads that I can offer the site for free. But using the site for free AND blocking the ads doesn't feel like a great thing to do, which is why this box is so large and inconvenient. Some sites will completely block your access, but I'm not doing that - I'm appealing to your good nature instead. Did you know that you can allow ads for specific sites, whilst still blocking them on others?

Thanks,
Ian Williams aka Fetch
or for an ad-free Fetcheveryone experience!

The Sub 3:15 Marathon Thread

4 lurkers | 334 watchers
Nov 2020
2:56pm, 2 Nov 2020
1,293 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Marchbanks
There is clear progress in those stats larkim. I hope your motivation stays strong.

I’ve decided to follow P&D, ummed and ahhed over it after reading the book in September but feel confident after reading so many people have progressed using these plans. 55-70 but will pick it up from 6 weeks in as I’ve already built up to 62 mpw (one week) and done two 18M.
Nov 2020
3:05pm, 2 Nov 2020
54 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
riggys99
P+D is a good way to go marchbanks lots of people on here who have used it to give advice.
Good luck with the training
Nov 2020
3:11pm, 2 Nov 2020
12,483 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
larkim
It's funny because my watch only samples very rarely too - and yet it appears not to display those sorts of short-cut gremlins. In the .fit files the individual points are usually as far as 6s apart from one another for long periods of time; my theory is that that the watch samples a few seconds worth of data, error corrects it a little to make it "sensible" and then only writes the sensible data to the file so what you see recorded is "robust".

I've just downloaded the original .fit file for a 3000m race where it recorded 1.88miles and the data points are more numerous there, at first every second and then more varying intervals (this one, for info fetcheveryone.com/t-16433375 ). It looks like it records a location every 2s round the bends, but more like every 5s on the straights, which I suppose is a bit like lossy compression - it doesn't need to record the 5s where I ran in a straight line, it just needs pont 1 and point 2 and the straight line can be drawn between the two with no wobble or deviation.
Nov 2020
3:14pm, 2 Nov 2020
12,484 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
larkim
Good luck Marchbanks - 55-70 is just a bit too far for me, but last time I got into good shape by using the 35-55mpw and then dropping in additional 5m runs on rest days (easy runs) and extending the long runs so that I did more of the 20m efforts, all the time keeping an eye on overall fatigue. Doing that I ended up with more weeks in the 50mpw range than the plan would have delivered for me.

Other club members often report that P&D injures them, but I find it's a nice interesting balance and mix of different runs, some of which intimidate me (the long tempos) and others which I get excited about (the intervals).
Nov 2020
3:25pm, 2 Nov 2020
36,290 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
HappyG(rrr)
The 55 - 70 mpw 18 week plan off back of decent 50 mile weeks background previously worked really well for me Marchbanks. They are well structured plans, I believe. Good luck. :-) G
Nov 2020
4:04pm, 2 Nov 2020
4,855 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Windsor Wool
it's just the midweek MLR that's so tough in P&D, particularly if you have to do it before or after work in the dark. Looking for ways to make this palatable was a challenge for me and that led me to the JD plan in the end.

I was able to run around 3:15 on the 55 plan, 3:0x on the 55-70 plan. No talent.

Gosh, 70 mpw sounds an awful lot in these (non marathon) days!
Nov 2020
4:15pm, 2 Nov 2020
36,293 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
HappyG(rrr)
I made the midweek long run (e.g. 12 - 14 miles) into 2 x commute (7 miiles each way) or joined it to a club run - do 3 miles before, 6 with club 3 after etc. as ways to fit it in.
Nov 2020
4:18pm, 2 Nov 2020
2,623 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
B Rubble
It's a tough one WW, but if you manage to get the widweek MLR done it certainly adds to your overall marathon strength. I resorted to 4am starts on a Thursday morning. One benefit being there are very few cars out at that time.
Nov 2020
4:19pm, 2 Nov 2020
12,488 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
larkim
At least the MLRs are purposeful, I found the easy / recovery runs harder to motivate myself for. I overcome it most of the time, but there's definitely a latent "no pain, no gain" mentality at the back of my mind.

And yes, I do know the easy / recovery stuff is purposeful too, its just that the doing of the MLR feels more purposeful than the doing of the easy stuff.
Nov 2020
4:22pm, 2 Nov 2020
36,294 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
HappyG(rrr)
Ah, the old "junk miles" debate... it's just like deja vu! :-) G

About This Thread

Maintained by Windsor Wool
For those who want to go sub 3.15 in a marathon and/or those that have already done it and want to give advice. Share your journey or help someone else's here.

2025 targets:
Charles - Ghent - 30 Mar
Mark J - Christchurch NZ - 13 Apr
riggys - Tissington - 27 Apr

2024 achievers:
Akie: 3:15 @ Rotterdam
allmatthew: 3:09 @ Manchester
Bowman: 3:01 @ Boras
Mark J: 3:12 @ Christchurch NZ
PJH92: 3:13 @ London
  • Show full description...

Related Threads

  • goals
  • marathon
  • sub
  • support
  • training








Back To Top

Tag A User

To tag a user, start typing their name here:
X

Free training & racing tools for runners, cyclists, swimmers & walkers.

Fetcheveryone lets you analyse your training, find races, plot routes, chat in our forum, get advice, play games - and more! Nothing is behind a paywall, and it'll stay that way thanks to our awesome community!
Get Started
Click here to join 114,034 Fetchies!
Already a Fetchie? Sign in here