Politics

6 lurkers | 212 watchers
29 Jul
9:18am, 29 Jul 2024
20,993 posts
  •  
  • 0
Dave W
Or just puts Ivanka in as the continuity President. Or makes her VP just before he kicks the bucket.

Remember. If it’s an official act carried out by the president then it’s legal.

Mind you. Rather her than the village idiot sons that he has.
SPR
29 Jul
10:14am, 29 Jul 2024
45,457 posts
  •  
  • 0
SPR
Reeves set to axe projects to plug budget 'black hole': bbc.co.uk

Politics to roar back at Westminster in blame game over funding: bbc.co.uk

From the second article: "Nonetheless, the argument we will hear from Rachel Reeves, in a Commons statement, a 30-odd page accompanying document and in a news conference at the Treasury, will be something like this: “We blame the other lot.”

They reckon by the time they are done, on Monday evening, the IFS and others will be acknowledging the numbers are different from what was previously publicly known”.

Will be interested to see whether this actually happens. Well I presume they will be different but will the IFS and others say they were materially different in a way that would affect decision making?
29 Jul
10:37am, 29 Jul 2024
28,692 posts
  •  
  • 0
richmac
This is whats concerning TBH, we're asking 'who's lying?'

I really want to know the answer.
29 Jul
10:57am, 29 Jul 2024
32,878 posts
  •  
  • 0
Johnny Blaze
Yakima Canutt wrote:The SCOTUS decision on immunity has no impact on the decision of the hush money trial. It may have a bearing on his sentencing. The 6th January trial has been knocked back and some elements of the special counsel case will no longer be relevant but there is a large amount still in play (such as all his interactions with state governors and Pence, SCOTUS decision is to put the case back to the lower court - its still on the table. It does not throw it out. I don't think it's the same as what you wrote JDA. Reminder also that all the cases brought relating to 2020 election fraud were thrown out, even those brought to SCOTUS. What this gives Trump is some time. Time to contest the election. Annoying, but I'd rather he runs and looses than is prevented from running by SCOTUS and further the conspiracy/victim play.


Strictly speaking it's already had an impact as he was due to be sentenced on 11th July and the judge pushed it back to September in light of the SC ruling. All those dodgy cheques he signed were signed when he was president as far as I can recall.
29 Jul
11:06am, 29 Jul 2024
32,879 posts
  •  
  • 0
Johnny Blaze
Couldnt see him getting jail time before and he certainly ain't likely to get it when voting starts in some parts in September. Shouldn't matter but I think it will. Wouldn't surprise me if it all got pushed back beyond the election.
29 Jul
12:36pm, 29 Jul 2024
168 posts
  •  
  • 0
Yakima Canutt
Agree JB the slippage of sentencing is to his benefit, but signing cheques to porn stars was not one of his official acts it was personal conduct. The DA prosecutor filed a motion to that effect last week.
jda
29 Jul
12:44pm, 29 Jul 2024
17,542 posts
  •  
  • 0
jda
I hope we are all looking forward to years of Labour austerity. Which will be fun and friendly because it’s Labour, not like the nasty cold Tory austerity.
29 Jul
12:47pm, 29 Jul 2024
32,880 posts
  •  
  • 0
Johnny Blaze
Yakima Canutt wrote:Agree JB the slippage of sentencing is to his benefit, but signing cheques to porn stars was not one of his official acts it was personal conduct. The DA prosecutor filed a motion to that effect last week.


Excellent!
29 Jul
12:53pm, 29 Jul 2024
22,786 posts
  •  
  • 0
rf_fozzy
Looks like the BMA and govt have agreed a pay deal for junior doctors.

Not bad for the first month of govt to solve one of the last government's issues that has rumbled on for years.

If course, if they'd sat down and negotiated, they'd have solved it too.

But then the Tories are wedded to public sector austerity.
SPR
29 Jul
1:21pm, 29 Jul 2024
45,459 posts
  •  
  • 0
SPR
Seems sensible to come to an agreement. Clearly there is some concern about what tough choices they've made to be able to fund it.

@richmac agree with your summary as Labour's position seems to be that the Tories have hidden stuff.

About This Thread

Maintained by Chrisull
Name-calling will be called out, and Ad hominem will be frowned upon. :-) And whatabout-ery sits somewhere above responding to tone and below contradiction.

*** Last poll winner

121 - Congrats to kstuart who predicted 121

*** Next poll will be along soon....

HappyG 270
Fenners Reborn 266
Jda 250
GeneHunt 205
Larkim 191
Mushroom 185
Bazoaxe 180
JamieKai 177
Cheg 171
Yakima Canutt 165
Chrisull 155
NDWDave 147
Macca53 138
JB 135
Derby Tup 133
Little Nemo 130
Big G 128
Kstuart 121
LindsD 120
Diogenes 117
Fields 111
B Rubble 110
Mrs Shanksi 103
J2r 101
Richmac 101
rf_fuzzy 100 (+15/-15)
simbil 99
DaveW 95
Paulcook 88
Fetch 85
Bob 72
Weean 69 and 2/3
Pothunter 50

Useful Links

FE accepts no responsibility for external links. Or anything, really.

Related Threads

  • brexit
  • debate
  • election
  • politics









Back To Top
X

Free training & racing tools for runners, cyclists, swimmers & walkers.

Fetcheveryone lets you analyse your training, find races, plot routes, chat in our forum, get advice, play games - and more! Nothing is behind a paywall, and it'll stay that way thanks to our awesome community!
Get Started
Click here to join 113,242 Fetchies!
Already a Fetchie? Sign in here