Hi ,
It looks like you're using an ad blocker.



The revenue generated from the adverts on the site is a critical part of our funding - and it's because of these ads that I can offer the site for free. But using the site for free AND blocking the ads doesn't feel like a great thing to do, which is why this box is so large and inconvenient. Some sites will completely block your access, but I'm not doing that - I'm appealing to your good nature instead. Did you know that you can allow ads for specific sites, whilst still blocking them on others?

Thanks,
Ian Williams aka Fetch
or for an ad-free Fetcheveryone experience!

Politics

4 lurkers | 220 watchers
Nov 2020
7:00pm, 17 Nov 2020
2,067 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Cheg
Yeah a narrow one might not have done the business. Don't suppose anyone has the bookies odds on brexit the date before the referendum?
Nov 2020
7:00pm, 17 Nov 2020
6,364 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Dooogs
Not sure if this belongs in this thread or the trans rights thread but Suzanne Moore's left the Guardian some months after catalysing a massive internal Graun row (with a fairly crass 'gender mostly equals biological sex' article).

Julie Bindel and the Spectator outraged, which is a helpful heuristic for who's in the right here...
Nov 2020
7:02pm, 17 Nov 2020
2,068 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Cheg
google.co.uk
Nov 2020
7:04pm, 17 Nov 2020
6,365 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Dooogs
I remember when 538's 73% Hillary likelihood came out four years ago,thinking 'Eek, that's a bit too similar to the Brexit odds a few months back "...
Nov 2020
7:13pm, 17 Nov 2020
2,069 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Cheg
Yeah the polls have been shocking, and from the look of that article the bookies did well over Brexit.
Nov 2020
7:26pm, 17 Nov 2020
24,101 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Johnny Blaze
Even the Brexiteers seem quite exhausted by it all, and the guff about the brave new Brexit world seems like whistling in the dark these days. I doubt many of them actually believe it: Tories say it for career preservation. Aside from Patel, who seems positively gleeful about being the politician who is proud to deny people like her parents the ability to migrate here.
I'd like to think that we will gradually move back towards the EU again to the point where joining again is a bit of a no-brainer. It may take a prolonged period of national decline though.
Nov 2020
7:59pm, 17 Nov 2020
12,270 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
rf_fozzy
"the polls have been shocking"

Nope. The polls have been about as accurate as they have been historically.

The one blemish was the 2016 US Pres election where the polls had a systematic error due to incorrect weighting and *very* late shift in support in the undecides towards Trump that was ignored due to poller herding, in some midwestern states (overlooked was the fact that they were well within the polling error almost everywhere else) and 2020 US Pres election in Florida where they seem to have underestimated cuban hispanic support for Trump (probably incorrect wieghting).

Polls for the 2008, 2012, 2014, 2018 elections have all been within the margin of error.

In the UK, the 2015, 2017, 2019 General elections have all be within the MoE (see YouGov's MRP model and how close that was) and the Brexit Referendum was well within the MoE.
Nov 2020
8:12pm, 17 Nov 2020
6,366 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Dooogs
Fozzy and co: as someone who's not a pro statistician, is there anything realistic the pollsters can do to make their individual MoEs smaller?

The obvious (if not necessarily feasible) answer is "make the sample sizes bigger" - or does that just magnify the potential sample selection errors?
Nov 2020
8:17pm, 17 Nov 2020
2,070 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Cheg
You do this every time fozzy. They got remain wrong they got Clinton wrong. Margin of error. Whatever they were wrong. You can't be a little bit pregnant.

centreonconstitutionalchange.ac.uk

projects.fivethirtyeight.com
Nov 2020
8:28pm, 17 Nov 2020
37,629 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Nellers
Predictions are really hard, especially about the future.

More or Less did a bit about polling. They're in a tricky spot. Mostly they used to do random telephone polling but these days who answers the phone to a number they don't know? And what's the alternative? Put a poll on any website and it's obviously self selecting. There's got to be a new way to get a representative sample but they don't seem to have found it yet.

Saying it was More or Less, might have been Prof Buzzkill actually.

About This Thread

Maintained by Chrisull
Name-calling will be called out, and Ad hominem will be frowned upon. :-) And whatabout-ery sits somewhere above responding to tone and below contradiction.

*** NEW US election PREDICTOR *** Predict:

Winner is TROSaracen 226 R R
  • Show full description...

Useful Links

FE accepts no responsibility for external links. Or anything, really.

Related Threads

  • brexit
  • debate
  • election
  • politics








Back To Top

Tag A User

To tag a user, start typing their name here:
X

Free training & racing tools for runners, cyclists, swimmers & walkers.

Fetcheveryone lets you analyse your training, find races, plot routes, chat in our forum, get advice, play games - and more! Nothing is behind a paywall, and it'll stay that way thanks to our awesome community!
Get Started
Click here to join 114,083 Fetchies!
Already a Fetchie? Sign in here