Hi ,
It looks like you're using an ad blocker.



The revenue generated from the adverts on the site is a critical part of our funding - and it's because of these ads that I can offer the site for free. But using the site for free AND blocking the ads doesn't feel like a great thing to do, which is why this box is so large and inconvenient. Some sites will completely block your access, but I'm not doing that - I'm appealing to your good nature instead. Did you know that you can allow ads for specific sites, whilst still blocking them on others?

Thanks,
Ian Williams aka Fetch
or for an ad-free Fetcheveryone experience!

Politics

2 lurkers | 216 watchers
Feb 2020
4:00pm, 6 Feb 2020
4,261 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Raemond
The graun doesn't carry the lurid detail, but the impression I'm getting is that it was a pretty one sided pursuit of a young person who may have been under the legal age of consent when it started.
Feb 2020
4:09pm, 6 Feb 2020
19,145 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
DeeGee
The Super Soaraway Sun has an almost complete transcript of the whole exchange.
Feb 2020
5:55pm, 6 Feb 2020
323 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Non-runner
Plus, it’s the abuse of power dynamic, 42 year old worldly-wise, successful man and 16 year old boy, even if over the legal age of consent. I’m sure the same condemnation would have applied were the youngster a female (see various grooming trials plus Harvey Weinstein etc).
Feb 2020
6:29pm, 6 Feb 2020
10,303 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
mrs shanksi
It is grooming! Very dodgy.
Feb 2020
7:19pm, 6 Feb 2020
10,261 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
larkim
Can it be grooming if the recipient is over the statutory age of consent? It's a logical corollary of the age of consent that anyone above it can have a lawful relationship with someone else above it (unless certain statutory regulations, such as to do with teachers for example).
Feb 2020
7:32pm, 6 Feb 2020
10,263 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
larkim
If 42:16 is "wrong" when the 42yo is a powerful politician, is it wrong of the 42yo is a part time charity shop worker? Or is it ok if the politician is 32yo and slightly less powerful?

Or if 42:16 is wrong, is 32:16 right? Or 28:16? Or 24:16? Where does "right" magically appear?
jda
Feb 2020
7:38pm, 6 Feb 2020
6,317 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
jda
Half your age and add 7 :-)

But that's not the law...
Feb 2020
7:58pm, 6 Feb 2020
8,385 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
simbil
There is no hard cut off Larks, which I guess is your point.

But the combination of age difference, amount of influence, role in society and how aggressive the pursuit is all combine and move it along the spectrum from socially uncomfortable to socially unacceptable.
jda
Feb 2020
8:02pm, 6 Feb 2020
6,319 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
jda
In a sane world, using your unelected dad to talk to the Chinese would also be unacceptable - just to use today's example.
Feb 2020
8:20am, 7 Feb 2020
23,033 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Johnny Blaze
He didn't know how old the lad was when he started texting him. Sounds very off to me.

About This Thread

Maintained by Chrisull
Name-calling will be called out, and Ad hominem will be frowned upon. :-) And whatabout-ery sits somewhere above responding to tone and below contradiction.

*** NEW US election PREDICTOR *** Predict:

Winner is TROSaracen 226 R R
  • Show full description...

Useful Links

FE accepts no responsibility for external links. Or anything, really.

Related Threads

  • brexit
  • debate
  • election
  • politics








Back To Top

Tag A User

To tag a user, start typing their name here:
X

Free training & racing tools for runners, cyclists, swimmers & walkers.

Fetcheveryone lets you analyse your training, find races, plot routes, chat in our forum, get advice, play games - and more! Nothing is behind a paywall, and it'll stay that way thanks to our awesome community!
Get Started
Click here to join 114,034 Fetchies!
Already a Fetchie? Sign in here