Heart rate
300 watchers
Jul 2017
9:12pm, 3 Jul 2017
1,811 posts
|
RunningInCircles
Not tried it. But here selfloops.com USB host needed on the Android device to support OTG cables. Not sure how many devices that is, but the Ant tester app will report if your device is capable of using an otg cable. |
Jul 2017
9:12pm, 3 Jul 2017
1,662 posts
|
StuHolmes
play.google.com I think this is what you're after MMM |
Jul 2017
9:15pm, 3 Jul 2017
1,812 posts
|
RunningInCircles
Oh, and I am not surprised at the lack of ant+ hardware support. Low energy Bluetooth is more versatile, draws less power and works with far more devices/scenarios. Ant+ was always niche. |
Jul 2017
10:26pm, 3 Jul 2017
2,322 posts
|
larkim
My cheap Chinese coospo (yes that is spelt correctly!) does Bluetooth and Ant+ in the same device so best of both worlds. I think the Ant+ capable means it is capable in software if you have an external Ant+ usb receiver plugged in via USB OTG. |
Jul 2017
10:43pm, 3 Jul 2017
618 posts
|
J2R
RunningInCircles, I understand from a technical point of view, but I would have thought Garmin was quite a big niche. Larkim, interesting about the Coospo. I bought a Bluetooth only version a year or so ago. I may check out the dual one, seems handy. I think the strap I use with my Garmin transmitter may actually be the Coospo one, or another cheap Chinese one. I found it more reliable than Garmin's own, which I used to get far more static problems with. |
Jul 2017
10:44pm, 3 Jul 2017
619 posts
|
J2R
SelfLoops is the HRV app I used.
|
Jul 2017
10:59pm, 3 Jul 2017
11,383 posts
|
Chrisull
But Garmin have ditched Ant+ now haven't they?
|
Jul 2017
11:15pm, 3 Jul 2017
8,527 posts
|
Badger
No. A few of their newest watches support Bluetooth sensors, but they still support ANT+, and the sensors Garmin make are all still ANT+. And there are things like the running dynamics they run over private ANT, though I think they're opening discussions on an open standard for that. I'm not surprised ANT+ hasn't been widely picked up on phones either; partly because people who have ANT+ sensors probably have Garmin watches anyway, and it didn't help that Garmin & the ANT Alliance failed very badly on getting Apple to support it on the iphones. ANT is very frugal on power - maybe current BT technology is better, but only recently, so I don't think that has much to do with breadth of support on phones. |
Jul 2017
8:46am, 4 Jul 2017
620 posts
|
J2R
I hope current BT technology is better, because I've always found Bluetooth to be patchy and unreliable in the past (in terms of HRM connectivity to a phone, anyway).
|
Jul 2017
10:30am, 4 Jul 2017
53 posts
|
DMZ
J2R my phone is a relatively old Samsung Galaxy Note 3, with a cracked screen and a battery that seems to only last half a day! I'm hoping I can make it last until next Spring before treating myself with a post-London Marathon new phone present. I also think that ANT+ is kinda niche from a smartphone point of view, but I don't think I'm ready to buy a BT HRM strap just for connecting to my phone. |
Related Threads
- Daniels Running Formula. The Definitive Wire. Jul 2023
- Jack daniels marathon plan help May 2014
- Polarized training Apr 2024
- Low Resting/ High Training Heart Rate Jan 2021
- No limit to the benefits of exercise in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease Jan 2021
- Resetting Max Heart Rate Dec 2020
- Resting Heart Rate: Is it normal Oct 2020
- Heart rate zones Jul 2020
- Running Heart rate Jun 2020
- Heart Rate monitors Jun 2020