Garmin
5 lurkers |
219 watchers
Mar 2023
8:55am, 20 Mar 2023
39,862 posts
|
SPR
Just read an article suggesting the LT detection issues I've noticed is a known bug. I've definitely done enough high effort chest strap runs since November for it to have detected a new one since then.
|
Mar 2023
9:21pm, 21 Mar 2023
2,693 posts
|
tipsku
I can't log in on the Garmin Connect website and the app is also giving me error messages. Anyone else with issues?
|
Mar 2023
9:24pm, 21 Mar 2023
4,214 posts
|
lin50
tipsku I just had a Garmin error message a saying there was a server outage. seems to be working ok now.
|
Mar 2023
11:28pm, 21 Mar 2023
2,789 posts
|
Steve NordRunner
Maybe we could put Garmin outage detector in the sidebar, or pin this post downdetector.com
|
|
Mar 2023
11:27am, 23 Mar 2023
39,888 posts
|
SPR
Comment on another thread reminded me about this question I wanted to ask about Runalyze. Is there a way to auto exclude some runs from the VO2 Max calculation? Anything interval like means poor calcs, but don't really want to have to click on all the runs I want to exclude.
|
Mar 2023
11:33am, 23 Mar 2023
20,671 posts
|
larkim
I suspect it will be manual only, but I've posted the question on the r/Runalye subreddit where they tend to reply pretty swifty. I use the "trail run" on Garmin quite a bit to achieve the same for the Garmin VO2Max data, but not really thought about the Runalyze data set as I feel their VO2Max estimates are a bit less well engineered. Though mainly I don't like the fact that they are lower 
|
|
Mar 2023
11:39am, 23 Mar 2023
39,889 posts
|
SPR
Thanks might join that. The issue with Runalyze is only works for steady/ progressive runs as the measurement is for the whole run (you can see the measurement each interval in laps). Garmin can take the VO2 max measurement from a section of the run. It would be nice if it auto recognised runs that would give poor data.
|
|
Mar 2023
11:46am, 23 Mar 2023
39,891 posts
|
SPR
P.S my Runalyze has generally been higher even with the intervals included (pre race correction) but with race correction that changes and with intervals it's almost 9 points lower currently.
|
|
Mar 2023
11:50am, 23 Mar 2023
39,892 posts
|
SPR
Just joined and looks like you were right about a quick response. Promising that they're looking at something similar to Garmin. Making sure it doesn't overestimate will be the challenge there I think.
|
|
Mar 2023
12:03pm, 23 Mar 2023
20,672 posts
|
larkim
There is the "time constant length for effective VO2Max" setting, but I don't know what that actually does. I suspect it is the setting for ignoring activities shorter than a specific length in seconds (e.g. my strides from last Friday had no runalyze VO2Max data against them as each one was about 21s long). I did intervals last night and the reps came out about 68-70 which is utter nonsense of course, though because I do jogging recoveries which I include in the run I suppose the averaging of the high values for reps is offset by the low value for recoveries. |
Related Threads
-
Garmin 735xt problem
Jan 2021
-
Garmin and Windows 10
Jun 2016
-
Help pls - what’s latest equiv to garmin vivoactive HR?
Jan 2024
-
Inporting Garmin historic data
Dec 2023
-
Garmin Connect IQ apps and widgets etc
Jan 2023
-
Polar Precision data
Jan 2022
-
PSA - Potential GPS watch stocking filler bargain?
Sep 2021
-
Running Apps Discrepancies
May 2021
-
Are replacement ANT sticks really *that* much?!
Sep 2013
-
Home Servers
Jan 2025