Bagging Area - Points, Hills and More
55 watchers
Mar 2023
11:05am, 20 Mar 2023
20,862 posts
|
flanker
I've done the proper thing and created feature requests: 1604 & 1605 if you want to express support or disagreement.
|
Mar 2023
11:10am, 20 Mar 2023
2,465 posts
|
paulcook
So far clicking on the notification for me has worked and taken me to that hill/trig, etc. However, since it's been introduced I've never bagged more than one point on a single entry so don't know what would happen if I clicked then. |
Mar 2023
11:30am, 20 Mar 2023
6,229 posts
|
Snoot
I’ve voted yes to both thanks flanker 👍 Second pic is from the map in training log rather than the actual activity trace fetcheveryone.com/training.php |
Mar 2023
12:10pm, 20 Mar 2023
10,876 posts
|
Fragile Do Not Bend
So far clicking on the notification for me has worked and taken me to that hill/trig, etc. However, since it's been introduced I've never bagged more than one point on a single entry so don't know what would happen if I clicked then. That’s interesting, when I clicked on it I just got the usual map centred on my home point. My run yesterday was 40 miles or so from home and not somewhere I normally go, so it was easy to identify the hill concerned based on it being the only green one in that vicinity. |
|
Mar 2023
12:27pm, 20 Mar 2023
20,863 posts
|
flanker
I do wonder if this has changed as I don't recall this annoying me originally (and it would have). So maybe that's how it used to work and the current behaviour is a regression?
|
Mar 2023
2:22pm, 20 Mar 2023
421 posts
|
ARB73
Noticed a marker in, what appears to be, the wrong location (No biggie and know I can manually claim it). Highlighting in case there are others or maybe a known issue. I was looking at a route I'd cycled over at the weekend (have also walked to the actual summit this year) and noticed that it didn't show as a peak. On further digging though the marker showed up nested under the marker for an adjacent hill. |
|
Mar 2023
2:36pm, 20 Mar 2023
2,468 posts
|
paulcook
It's right according to this: hill-bagging.co.uk Looks like the other point is just about the same height, but there's observations about other points being as little as 5cm, 1.5m and 2.5m lower. |
|
Mar 2023
4:19pm, 20 Mar 2023
422 posts
|
ARB73
It's right according to this: hill-bagging.co.uk Looks like the other point is just about the same height, but there's observations about other points being as little as 5cm, 1.5m and 2.5m lower. Fair enough - it was when both Ballencrieff Hill and Cairnpapple showed as almost the exact same location I guessed one might be incorrect, particularly when the map showed Cairnpapple just a few hundred metres North. This suggests the two hills are often confused, either way, no biggie for me:- waymarking.com |
|
Mar 2023
4:27pm, 20 Mar 2023
423 posts
|
ARB73
And thanks for looking in to it 
|
|
Mar 2023
4:45pm, 20 Mar 2023
2,472 posts
|
paulcook
Looks like one is a trig and one a hill. I'm not going to even second guess how the names are as they are there.
|
Useful Links
FE accepts no responsibility for external links. Or anything, really.Related Threads
-
Bob Graham Round
Feb 2025
-
FE Lake District Lovers
Feb 2025
-
Fetch Fell Runners
Jan 2025
-
The XC thread
Feb 2025
-
Cader Idris
May 2016
-
distance, gradient and a little trigonometry
Apr 2016
-
Powis Arms Bury ditches Hill Race
Sep 2015
-
Running in trail shoes ?
May 2013
-
Road running v off-road (particularly races)
Jan 2013
-
RedBull Steeplechase and Fell Running
Sep 2012