Bagging Area - Points, Hills and More
55 watchers
Mar 2023
11:05am, 20 Mar 2023
20,862 posts
|
flanker
I've done the proper thing and created feature requests: 1604 & 1605 if you want to express support or disagreement.
|
Mar 2023
11:10am, 20 Mar 2023
2,465 posts
|
paulcook
So far clicking on the notification for me has worked and taken me to that hill/trig, etc. However, since it's been introduced I've never bagged more than one point on a single entry so don't know what would happen if I clicked then. |
Mar 2023
11:30am, 20 Mar 2023
6,229 posts
|
Snoot
I’ve voted yes to both thanks flanker 👍 Second pic is from the map in training log rather than the actual activity trace fetcheveryone.com/training.php |
Mar 2023
12:10pm, 20 Mar 2023
10,876 posts
|
Fragile Do Not Bend
So far clicking on the notification for me has worked and taken me to that hill/trig, etc. However, since it's been introduced I've never bagged more than one point on a single entry so don't know what would happen if I clicked then. That’s interesting, when I clicked on it I just got the usual map centred on my home point. My run yesterday was 40 miles or so from home and not somewhere I normally go, so it was easy to identify the hill concerned based on it being the only green one in that vicinity. |
|
Mar 2023
12:27pm, 20 Mar 2023
20,863 posts
|
flanker
I do wonder if this has changed as I don't recall this annoying me originally (and it would have). So maybe that's how it used to work and the current behaviour is a regression?
|
Mar 2023
2:22pm, 20 Mar 2023
421 posts
|
ARB73
Noticed a marker in, what appears to be, the wrong location (No biggie and know I can manually claim it). Highlighting in case there are others or maybe a known issue. I was looking at a route I'd cycled over at the weekend (have also walked to the actual summit this year) and noticed that it didn't show as a peak. On further digging though the marker showed up nested under the marker for an adjacent hill. |
|
Mar 2023
2:36pm, 20 Mar 2023
2,468 posts
|
paulcook
It's right according to this: hill-bagging.co.uk Looks like the other point is just about the same height, but there's observations about other points being as little as 5cm, 1.5m and 2.5m lower. |
|
Mar 2023
4:19pm, 20 Mar 2023
422 posts
|
ARB73
It's right according to this: hill-bagging.co.uk Looks like the other point is just about the same height, but there's observations about other points being as little as 5cm, 1.5m and 2.5m lower. Fair enough - it was when both Ballencrieff Hill and Cairnpapple showed as almost the exact same location I guessed one might be incorrect, particularly when the map showed Cairnpapple just a few hundred metres North. This suggests the two hills are often confused, either way, no biggie for me:- waymarking.com |
|
Mar 2023
4:27pm, 20 Mar 2023
423 posts
|
ARB73
And thanks for looking in to it 
|
|
Mar 2023
4:45pm, 20 Mar 2023
2,472 posts
|
paulcook
Looks like one is a trig and one a hill. I'm not going to even second guess how the names are as they are there.
|
Useful Links
FE accepts no responsibility for external links. Or anything, really.Related Threads
-
Fetch Fell Runners
May 2025
-
FE Lake District Lovers
Apr 2025
-
Bob Graham Round
Apr 2025
-
The XC thread
Feb 2025
-
Cader Idris
May 2016
-
distance, gradient and a little trigonometry
Apr 2016
-
Powis Arms Bury ditches Hill Race
Sep 2015
-
Running in trail shoes ?
May 2013
-
Road running v off-road (particularly races)
Jan 2013
-
RedBull Steeplechase and Fell Running
Sep 2012
Report This Content
You can report any content you believe to be unsafe. Please let me know why you believe this content is unsafe by choosing a category below.
Thank you for your report. The content will be assessed as soon as possible.