80% WAVA
1 lurker |
28 watchers
Feb 2024
11:51am, 4 Feb 2024
15,012 posts
|
hellen
Hello, yesterday at PR I got an 80% WAVA, my first ever. 😄😄However, fetch is telling me it’s 79% 🥲🥲why the difference please. Sorry to jump on, I just spotted this thread and haven’t read back!
|
Feb 2024
11:57am, 4 Feb 2024
67,640 posts
|
Velociraptor
Well done, hellen ![]() |
Feb 2024
12:04pm, 4 Feb 2024
15,013 posts
|
hellen
Thanks V, so now I need to knock some more time off to get a proper 80%! There I was thinking I was done because 20.59 is too far away from sub 20 so I thought no more goals and retire from PR! |
Feb 2024
12:19pm, 4 Feb 2024
67,642 posts
|
Velociraptor
WAVAs are getting tougher all the time. For me, and possibly for you although you're a bit younger, I think it reflects at least in part the fact that we're the first generation of women who grew up with access to road races longer than 6km. 80% seems to get further and further away for me and a WAVA upgrade last year took away my only 79%. |
Feb 2024
12:46pm, 4 Feb 2024
15,014 posts
|
hellen
Can anyone explain this I do more marathons than I do 5km, I consider myself a better marathon runner than 5km runner. When I was at my fittest I did 19.34 5km and 3.12.21 marathon. At marathon I tend to beat people with a faster 5km /10km than me. So why is my 5km WAVA higher than my marathon WAVA? |
Feb 2024
12:56pm, 4 Feb 2024
16,382 posts
|
jda
Most people find marathon WAVAs much harder than shorter distances. You can be good relative to most people but still not good relative to the records! I actually have a marginally better marathon wava than for shorter distances, but I'm quite an anomaly and even then I've never truly peaked for a 10k or HM, my bests for these have been training races on the way to the marathon. |
Feb 2024
1:01pm, 4 Feb 2024
16,383 posts
|
jda
And I think fundamentally it's a metabolism thing rather than poor training. Around 2h or maybe 2:30, you can run pretty much 100% on glycogen. Once you are close to 3h and especially going well over, you have to burn a lot of fat which requires more oxygen for a given energy output and thus provides less power per breath. So it's a different type of endurance event for mere mortals versus elites.
|
Feb 2024
1:05pm, 4 Feb 2024
22,356 posts
|
Sharkie
What jda says. Most people are at their best somewhere in the middle of race distances - even after training specifically. Stands to reason. There are just as few true sprinters (100-200m) as there are marathon runners. Our own Mrs Jigs is one of those rare people whose WAVA score just gets better and better the closer she gets to marathon distance. I'm not as good as Mrs J but am another rarity as my WAVAs get better- a direct line down from 10k* - the closer I get to 60m. That's meters not miles * I DID train for it once upon a time. |
Feb 2024
9:15pm, 6 Feb 2024
16,795 posts
|
57.5 Days of Pain
As with everything in running these days, WAVAs will get tougher as the top age group runners, female or male, get a boost from technology. parkrun WAVAs are not really applicable to the 'brave new world'. Its still a nice target though. And 80% using the different tables even gives several levels of challenge. And I'd still be very happy to see an 80% WAVA anywhere again using the old table, but it seems increasingly far away. |
Feb 2024
1:41pm, 11 Feb 2024
815 posts
|
solo
Hopefully once you are able to run again 57.5 Days of Pain your fitness will return. After my recent battle with C19 I was delighted to run an undulating 10k in 45.17 this morning giving me an over 80 wava. It was 7 seconds slower than last year but a higher wava 82.77. The roads were pretty flooded in places too which is always fun. |
Related Threads
-
70% WAVA Feb 2025
-
WAVA question Nov 2024
-
WAVA and ranking tables Aug 2024
-
RunBritain rankings Jul 2024
-
60% WAVA thread Jun 2024
-
65% WAVA thread Feb 2024
-
Race Standards Mar 2022
-
Times Jan 2021
-
The Gallant Failure Thread Sep 2019
-
When did/will you peak? Dec 2018