RunBritain rankings

21 watchers

larkim 5 Jul 2:26pm, 5 Jul 2024 24,978 posts	0 larkim But don't times round up anyway like that? I thought that was the way it should be for roundings of race times that aren't recorded to 0.x of a second?
J2R 5 Jul 2:35pm, 5 Jul 2024 5,418 posts	0 J2R Race times are normally rounded properly, as far as I know. So 18:59.4 is 18:59, 18:59.5 is 19:00.
larkim 5 Jul 2:36pm, 5 Jul 2024 24,980 posts	0 larkim This is in the WA technical rules:- So assuming we're talking road races, even if the timing system reports then as .x of a second, "official" recording should only ever be rounded up to the nearest second.
larkim 5 Jul 2:38pm, 5 Jul 2024 24,981 posts	0 larkim I guess it's logically because if you post 18:59.4 but want to round down, you're effectively saying you ran in 18:59 when in fact you took longer than that.
J2R 5 Jul 3:29pm, 5 Jul 2024 5,419 posts	0 J2R Wow! That comes as a surprise to me, as I've never noticed this happening before. Maybe that's because the results are now being submitted with .x of a second whereas before they were not? "I guess it's logically because if you post 18:59.4 but want to round down, you're effectively saying you ran in 18:59 when in fact you took longer than that." - Yes, but not as long as 19:00.
larkim 5 Jul 3:49pm, 5 Jul 2024 24,982 posts	0 larkim I guess the "fault" is on the part of the chip timing company publishing results to the 0.1s detail. I don't think I've seen any results locally that give that level of precision, so I suppose I have to trust that they are rounding properly (who knows, they could be rounding 18:59.4 to 18:59, and no-one would ever know!)
SPR 5 Jul 5:42pm, 5 Jul 2024 45,005 posts	0 SPR I've never seen tenths or lower for road.
Jen HB 5 Jul 5:53pm, 5 Jul 2024 2,670 posts	0 Jen HB Aah, the delights of rounding rules.... (I work in a lab and there are 2 exceptions: for one technique it's round up the other is round down)