|
Jan 2011
10:29pm, 18 Jan 2011
886 posts
|
sallykate
Impressive stuff sioux!!
|
|
Jan 2011
10:31pm, 18 Jan 2011
12,990 posts
|
HappyG(rrr)
Quite right sioux - proud mum is perfectly justified. I wonder if he'd sprint/jog it now or run more steadily? That's such a nice memory. Wee star!
Yes sallykate, everything counts if it's something that you feel is taking you forward. And the whole idea is to push your numbers to meet YOUR goals! Go for it! :-)G
|
|
Jan 2011
11:12am, 19 Jan 2011
191 posts
|
Wriggling Snake
club run included drills and plyometrics, totally stuffed my legs, way over an hour too 
|
|
Jan 2011
11:15am, 19 Jan 2011
342 posts
|
Jerboa
What a great idea, no idea how much I normally do in a year but I'll give it a shot. I do run but also do tonnes of walking and am trying to do core excercises too. I have a feeling that along with my running it's going to be over achieved!!
|
|
Jan 2011
4:41pm, 19 Jan 2011
1,176 posts
|
Isabel
welcome jerboa
added another half hour by cycling to and from uni to drop off a form, rather than my usual laziness of mopeding! 3 whole hours total, woop! :Pl
|
|
Jan 2011
4:46pm, 19 Jan 2011
13,000 posts
|
HappyG(rrr)
Gutted. Didn't get to do yoga at work. Work gets in way of training shocker. :-)G
|
|
Jan 2011
4:52pm, 19 Jan 2011
347 posts
|
Jerboa
Er...Just a query... In the header where people have put their time achieved, ie, 5.26 or whatever, is that as in a decimal place like 26/100ths of an hour or is in in minutes, in which case it wouldn't be a decimal point? I'm not good at maths so won't be doing the %
|
|
Jan 2011
5:17pm, 19 Jan 2011
1,177 posts
|
Isabel
I dont think it matters a huge amount as long as you know which you've used, but your training log should give it in hours and minutes so probably easiest
|
|
Jan 2011
5:19pm, 19 Jan 2011
895 posts
|
sallykate
I've used minutes ie 11:10 is 11 hour and 10 minutes -- cos it was easier as Isabel said
|
|
Jan 2011
5:20pm, 19 Jan 2011
2,451 posts
|
The Terminator
Mine is in hours and minutes but that then means % figure is not wholly accurate...
|
