|
Dec 2017
5:02pm, 1 Dec 2017
27,855 posts
|
HappyG(rrr)
It's still doing it. But I'm probably just still being thick!  G
|
|
Dec 2017
5:02pm, 1 Dec 2017
27,856 posts
|
HappyG(rrr)
TOTP! G
|
|
Dec 2017
5:20pm, 1 Dec 2017
1,981 posts
|
StuHolmes
I think current pace on the old log = split pace on the new.
And changing sample rate on old = changing split size on new.
|
|
Dec 2017
5:43pm, 1 Dec 2017
2,411 posts
|
K5 Gus
Yeah, I don't think current pace on the old log was the instantaneous pace at that point, the x-axis was still effectively split up into chunks determined by the sampling rate I think.
On old chart, just checked my run today and chose a hilly bit at 1.88miles, at 100m sample rate the pace was different from a 50m sample rate at the same distance. Surely it would be the same if instantaneous pace ??
Saying that, the same point, at the same sample rate ( 50m ) on old and new is showing quite different pace figures, so no actual idea what is being shown......
|
|
Dec 2017
6:53pm, 1 Dec 2017
3,461 posts
|
larkim
I've dropped my rating from good to ok. Really not getting on with the initial display of too many splits, that's definitely my biggest bugbear.
|
|
Dec 2017
8:28pm, 1 Dec 2017
1,080 posts
|
Sigh (Simon Clarke)
I've been thinking about the split time table - which is (was) also my biggest bugbear - and have decided to minimise it. For sharing with others, the line graph says enough; when I want to analyse my split times, I'll always go the source data anyway. So I've concluded I don't need the split times here as well.
|
|
Dec 2017
4:11pm, 3 Dec 2017
20,327 posts
|
eL Bee!
Just uploaded a ride which had an inadvertent 'lap' at the café stop. (I normally have any form of lapping switched off on bike rides)
The map graph etc are only showing the 1st 'lap' (elevation is showing everything, and the total distance and time are correct )
It's fine where I've uploaded it to Another Place!
|
|
Dec 2017
8:40pm, 4 Dec 2017
6,130 posts
|
The_Saint
I love the split options, it was one of the things I used to use Sporttracks for
|
|
Dec 2017
9:17am, 5 Dec 2017
First-time poster!!
|
ZORBAX65
it would be nice to have in the initial part where the main data are also reported that of the maximum difference in height, to have a first impact of what if done.
|
|
Dec 2017
9:12am, 12 Dec 2017
4,545 posts
|
Northern Exile
Yes, I'd agree with that. I'd like a better visual representation of the height gained.
|
