|
Aug 2007
8:31am, 14 Aug 2007
1,349 posts
|
hellen
did my double yesterday or perhaps it was a triple not sure!!!
am run was 3.4miles 71% (ooops slightly over)
pm ran to body pump 2.9 miles (68%)
pm ran back from body pump 1.7 miles (66%)
I have now run too and from body pump for the last 3 weeks and this weeks runs were much slower than the last 2 weeks, I assume that was due to doing a run in the am. As I get more practiced at doubles will the pm one become less slow?
Also, since my pm one was so slow, if I were to do doubles on an interval day does that mean I should do the intervals in the am?
|
|
Aug 2007
9:01am, 14 Aug 2007
9,635 posts
|
Hellen, I think it's a matter of preference or for some practicality. For example my interval sessins are done with the club in the evening. If I have run that morning or lunchtime I make sure that I run easy. then I can give it everything in the intervals session.
|
|
Aug 2007
10:39am, 14 Aug 2007
1,350 posts
|
hellen
I think yesterday eve prob felt harder than usual because I had a hard session on sun and went a bit over 70% in the am. also I think I was a bit underfed
|
|
Aug 2007
11:09am, 14 Aug 2007
2,051 posts
|
Diogenes
I've added my info in.
Got a new 10k pb on Sunday but just missed going under the 50m mark. Here are the splits and HR figures:
KM TIME AHR MHR
01: 5:08 162 169
02: 4:55 167 174
03: 4:53 172 176
04: 4:59 172 174
05: 4:54 173 175
06: 5:31 174 176 (Hill)
07: 4:51 173 175
08: 5:08 175 178 (tiring now when I should be speeding up)
09: 5:09 175 177
10: 4:47 179 181 (found a little bit at the end, but not enough)
Overall time 50:18 AHR 172 = 87%
|
|
Aug 2007
11:11am, 14 Aug 2007
4 posts
|
Berni
If it's not beating , have a rest.
|
|
Aug 2007
4:36pm, 14 Aug 2007
714 posts
|
eL Bee!
Recovery pace run - but aiming for 2 hours on feet for some super mitochondria building!<br>
Job Done on that count! :-)<br>
It was raining - and I LOVE running in the rain, so this was just brilliant miles for me - and at a decent time of day as it was with Velociraptor in her 'lunch break'<br>
No HR stats today as WearLink strap had gone awol, and the battery in my old strap has finally died :o(<br>
But it will have been 62-65% and there won't have been a beat above 157! 
|
|
Aug 2007
7:25pm, 14 Aug 2007
1,454 posts
|
Homer
Hi HR folk...can you answer a question for me please?
When I run (without a proper warm-up) my HR goes very high before settling down, even if I start slowly. Is this normal? A mate said it was just the monitor not reading properly.
|
|
Aug 2007
7:55pm, 14 Aug 2007
9,657 posts
|
Homer,
Most common problem is the HRM strap not connecting properly until you sweat enough to make a good contact. Always wet the strap with saliva or salt water or similar to get a good contact.
Usually it takes a little while for the heart rate to speed up to start with...
|
|
Aug 2007
8:09pm, 14 Aug 2007
724 posts
|
eL Bee!
Homer - Agree with Ian, it's most likely to be a poor contact on your strap! Get it really wet before you start off, and you should see more consistency.
Physiologically, if you run at x-pace, your HR will gradually increase until it is working at the optimal rate for that effort, It doesn't shoot up and then settle back down again!
|
|
Aug 2007
8:17pm, 14 Aug 2007
19,586 posts
|
Hanneke
So, how do I go about this HR training thing then? My RHR is 39, NHR is 198... so for example, what should an easy run be like?
|
