Heart rate
1 lurker |
301 watchers
Jul 2007
3:01pm, 28 Jul 2007
1,194 posts
|
hellen
well done features. Yes def do some race paced runs but obviouly a shorter distance than race pace. provided you taper before the race you should beable to maintain a faster pace than in training. For my first few HMs (before HRM days) I did 10 miles the weekend before at roughly the pace of my HM. I remember the 10mile feeling hard and wondering how on earth I would manage that pace for another 3.1 miles but because I didnt do a lot during the week before the HM I was reasonably well rested so it was OK. BTW I wouldnt recommend doing 10 miles at race pace the weekend before, I didnt know any better though in those days! |
Jul 2007
5:13pm, 28 Jul 2007
34 posts
|
Thanks for the tips, Ian, Hellen. Will try to follow them through and let you know how it goes! |
Jul 2007
5:14pm, 28 Jul 2007
35 posts
|
PS nice new piccy Ian! |
Jul 2007
7:44pm, 28 Jul 2007
9,446 posts
|
Thanks Features. WGT, well said. |
Jul 2007
9:38pm, 28 Jul 2007
682 posts
|
Badger
Anybody who's looking for a copy of Parker, abebooks.co.uk is a good place to look - it's an online clearing house for second hand bookshops internationally. And there's a copy on there for £10.49 + postage at the moment abebooks.co.uk |
Jul 2007
9:59pm, 28 Jul 2007
4,000 posts
|
I lent my book to a fellow Fetchie, as I had read it from cover to cover and had, erm, "copied" certain, frequently referred to extracts. When I get it back (I did say I was in no rush) I will pass it on, so to speak. Can't believe the price of it - I'm sure I only paid about £5 for it over a year ago. |
Jul 2007
10:03pm, 28 Jul 2007
534 posts
|
eL Bee!
It's really difficult to actually get the abebooks copies - I've failed a few times! But I'm also happy to lend out my copy to anyone who really wants to delve into it's mysteries |
Jul 2007
10:19pm, 28 Jul 2007
4,005 posts
|
Hi eL Bee! Tis a shame that this book is difficult to come by - testament, perhaps, to how good it is. I'm not sure about its "mysteries" - imho, it talks a lot of common sense, with some excellent case studies to highlight the merits of the "approach" I can't sing its praises, so to speak, loud enough though I don't think it is for everyone |
Jul 2007
10:27pm, 28 Jul 2007
535 posts
|
eL Bee!
Evening JB I agree - it's a common-sense approach to training, and gives a useful structure where perhaps people were training without. It works spectacularly well for some - and less so for others, but what it certainly does allow, is for prolonged periods of consistent and injury-free training! And that has to be a Good Thing! |
Jul 2007
11:21pm, 28 Jul 2007
4,013 posts
|
eL Bee! I whole heartedly (no pun intended) agree re the common sense approach. One things that has got me since I took up running again and have followed the HR/"70%maxWHR" is that I have been told that my "longer" runs should have been done at a lower rate per mile! Why? - my HR figures showed that they were 65-70%WHR (and they were very comfortable) - why should I go slower? Surely your HR measures the "intensity" of ones run? |
Related Threads
- Daniels Running Formula. The Definitive Wire. Jul 2023
- Jack daniels marathon plan help May 2014
- Polarized training Apr 2024
- Low Resting/ High Training Heart Rate Jan 2021
- No limit to the benefits of exercise in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease Jan 2021
- Resetting Max Heart Rate Dec 2020
- Resting Heart Rate: Is it normal Oct 2020
- Heart rate zones Jul 2020
- Running Heart rate Jun 2020
- Heart Rate monitors Jun 2020