Heart rate
1 lurker |
300 watchers
Jul 2007
8:22am, 27 Jul 2007
762 posts
|
Girlie
In that case, the Polar range is supposed to be quite good. This is where we got our 305 and Polar F11 from heartratemonitor.co.uk They seem to stock virtually every model and make and are a reasonable price. Don't think the F11 does laps though. |
Jul 2007
8:32am, 27 Jul 2007
14,642 posts
|
Siouxsie
I was really pleased to get the HR for each lap on the garmin 305...small things...*sigh*  I'm going for my first lsr with the hrm on today, so I'll be nterested to see if I am actually taking it easy on the run....or not! |
Jul 2007
8:38am, 27 Jul 2007
1,908 posts
|
Diogenes
I've got a Polar RS200SD and am very happy with it. I've got the footpod option so I can measure distance and pace. Without that I think you can get hold of them (RS200) for about £90 from the site Girlie mentioned above. You can add the Footpod bit later if you want
|
Jul 2007
9:36am, 27 Jul 2007
3,305 posts
|
Lumsdoni
305 for me too TMW, no complaints yet! Hellen, if you are that interested try checking out Chi Running or POSE I think it is - I've seen alot on Fetch about it. Haven't read it though! I simply shortened my stride and and leant forward a little. Then the increase in leg speed seemed to come naturally, but I was surprised to see I was suddenly averaging under 9:00 for 70% or less. Of course it could be that I was just running highly inefficiently for 18 months! |
Jul 2007
11:14am, 28 Jul 2007
9,443 posts
|
What I am about to say has absolutely no basis in scientific fact and it does not represent the opinions of any person or entity other than myself. Using a HRM to bring structure to training has helped me and I see it has helped many others to improve. This may or may not be attributable to use of the HRM itself but who cares? Using a HRM (Parker's technique or any other) allows people (especially beginners) to accurately assess how hard they are working and alter their training to suit thus avoiding over training whilst being able to train probably more miles than they did before. Nobody needs convincing whether they are a good thing to use, it is an individual choice, some use them some don't just like some people run 70 miles a week, some don't. You don't need a heart rate monitor ( you don't need any gadget) but it seems to help some of us and that can only be a good thing. Only training hard all the time suits some, not others. In my view (based on personal experience) running hard all the time means more injuries, less miles and no progress. Oh and for the record, I haven't used my HRM for trainng for a while now because I have developed an allergic reaction to the strap, in fact most things with elastic in them (yes, not nice). However, I have used one for a long time and I can much more accurately assess where my HR is for a given effort and I still run hard days and easy days. This doesn't mean I don't think they are a vauable training aid, I do. This thread is not about preaching the HRM gospel. It isn't about convincing people to use them or not. Most who visit this thread already use them and they want to speak to others who do. WGT, well done. It's great to see you enjoying your training. Other people seem to like using a HRM too and it looks like doing so helps their training in some way... goforarun.co.uk |
|
Jul 2007
11:28am, 28 Jul 2007
2,098 posts
|
Mudskipper
Morning. I'll hold my hands up now and say I'm a lazy sod so I don't intend to read back through 362 pages to find an answer to the question Which is THE best book to buy on HRM Training? I have looked about and the Parker - Compleat idiot guide does come up a lot but I refuse to pay £45 for a second hand book on amazon. So any ideas/views please.
|
|
Jul 2007
11:41am, 28 Jul 2007
14,646 posts
|
Siouxsie
£45 !??! Blimey! Why so much? It's only $19.95 new!
|
|
Jul 2007
11:43am, 28 Jul 2007
2,100 posts
|
Mudskipper
No idea Siouxsie but that what it comes up as on Amazon
|
Jul 2007
2:12pm, 28 Jul 2007
33 posts
|
Thanks Ian, I'm with you with all you've just said. I managed another first today-my first 20k, with average HR spot on 70% (I gave up trying to keep it below for the last 4km or so!) I'm really encouraged and am beginning to notice it drifting down if I relax too much, especially for the first few kms. With the HM in October, I'm confident of going the distance but not sure how my game plan should be on the day. I feel like I need to do some shorter runs at "race pace" just to see if I can maintain that pace for long enough to reach the time that Girlie would like us to finish in (approx 2h 15mins). I'm still doing very few 85% runs but my quads seem quite strong and injury free now so perhaps I should give them a go...? I feel good about managing that distance...not unusual for most of you guys, but for me it's quite a milestone!
|
|
Jul 2007
2:21pm, 28 Jul 2007
9,445 posts
|
Thanks Features. That sounds very sensible to me. Well done and I'm really glad you are enjoying your training and starting to reap the benefits of the structure and self discipline you have applied. Nothing wrong at all with shorter race paced runs; they will build confidence and strength/stamina. Good luck with the half mara. :-):-) |
Related Threads
-
Daniels Running Formula. The Definitive Wire.
Jul 2023
-
Jack daniels marathon plan help
May 2014
-
Polarized training
Apr 2024
-
Low Resting/ High Training Heart Rate
Jan 2021
-
No limit to the benefits of exercise in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease
Jan 2021
-
Resetting Max Heart Rate
Dec 2020
-
Resting Heart Rate: Is it normal
Oct 2020
-
Heart rate zones
Jul 2020
-
Running Heart rate
Jun 2020
-
Heart Rate monitors
Jun 2020