May 2013
12:32pm, 17 May 2013
4,549 posts
|
rf_fozzy
Looking like a lead of nearly 300 for Yorkshire. Rashid with an unbeaten ton at time of writing. Sidearse with a useful 20 in support.
Not bad, given that our two in-form batsmen are propping up England's middle order at Lord's.
Don't think Lords is playing as well as it usually does - slower outfield and ball nipping about. If they can get to 280, it'll give them something to bowl at.
Worry will be whether a 30min McCullum blitz might change the game in a low-scoring affair.
|
May 2013
12:34pm, 17 May 2013
982 posts
|
Nelly
Surprise surprise, three wickets in 10 minutes and England are in trouble again.
|
May 2013
12:37pm, 17 May 2013
7,528 posts
|
TRO Saracen
Arse.
Huge collapse.
Where's Monty you need a 10th wicket stand
|
May 2013
12:37pm, 17 May 2013
4,226 posts
|
Wriggling Snake
Jesus, really, a bit damp and steamy, NZ good or England a bit rubbish....
|
May 2013
12:38pm, 17 May 2013
949 posts
|
FreshStart
I think the NZ bowling has been pretty good (not that I've been watching all morning and not working)
|
May 2013
12:41pm, 17 May 2013
4,551 posts
|
rf_fozzy
Yorks 407 all out. Lead of 279 against Warwicks. 110no for Rashid.
|
May 2013
12:44pm, 17 May 2013
4,552 posts
|
rf_fozzy
Bresy strikes first ball!
|
May 2013
1:04pm, 17 May 2013
1,387 posts
|
Hackett
209/8 and with only Bairstow as a recognised batsmen the kiwis will be happy with that score.
|
May 2013
1:04pm, 17 May 2013
1,388 posts
|
Hackett
209/8 and with only Bairstow as a recognised batsmen the kiwis will be happy with that score.
|
May 2013
1:08pm, 17 May 2013
7,249 posts
|
The Teaboy
We have a recognised batsman?
|