So who won the tour from 1999 to 2005
80 watchers
Dec 2014
3:00pm, 29 Dec 2014
2,215 posts
|
Pizza Boy
Sorry to but in but I have a question now you mention salbutamol velociraptor. I've only recently been given a blue inhaler due to finally being persuaded wheezing and breathlessness for no apparant reason isn't a healthy sign in an athlete. It can also be triggered by cold air etc. It's been asked by fellow athletes whether or not the salbutamol gives any added advantage over others due to expanding the surface area of the lungs. I.e surely it can't only open the airways to the exact "normal" point and so may go beyond what is "normal" thus could be giving an advantage of how much O2 can enter? On another note my GP was talking about a possible steroid inhaler in a few months time after further assessment but I wasn't sure whether I can take this IAAF laws etc can anyone fill me in on that? |
Dec 2014
3:23pm, 29 Dec 2014
31,773 posts
|
Velociraptor
Pizza Boy, there's absolutely no benefit to be had for a "normal" non-asthmatic person by taking salbutamol, and the dose in an inhaler is tiny. Clenbuterol is different as it has effects which could potentially be performance-enhancing in other ways, which is why one isn't banned and the other is. Steroid inhalers for asthma aren't banned by any of the drug regulating authorities nowadays as far as I know. |
Dec 2014
3:27pm, 29 Dec 2014
1,459 posts
|
MudMeanderer
PB, UKAD has the following WADA based guidelines. It looks like most steroid based inhalers are fine if used as manufacturer recommends. Could take this list to docs if concerned. ukad.org.uk |
Dec 2014
4:37pm, 29 Dec 2014
2,216 posts
|
Pizza Boy
Ahh very interesting thank-you both of you. If there isn't any benefit to be had why is there a threshold limit on Salbutamol before it becomes "doping"? |
Dec 2014
4:45pm, 29 Dec 2014
31,775 posts
|
Velociraptor
I assume it's because, in theory, it's a stimulant, although if you take too much salbutamol you're more likely to get the shakes than to run faster. wired.com |
Jan 2015
9:42am, 23 Jan 2015
3,284 posts
|
fitzer
Does this mean the are looking at Sky. bbc.com |
Jan 2015
1:47pm, 23 Jan 2015
19,838 posts
|
SPR
No, he wasn't there long enough.
|
Jan 2015
6:15pm, 26 Jan 2015
3,285 posts
|
fitzer
Prick, Liar, Cheat. bbc.com |
Jan 2015
6:17pm, 26 Jan 2015
32,042 posts
|
Velociraptor
That's probably the first truth he's told in his entire cycling career
|
Jan 2015
10:09pm, 26 Jan 2015
2,220 posts
|
JulesR
I'm a bit confused why the BBC has decided to interview Lance - is there any demand to hear about how he cheated or would cheat any more? Aren't the BBC a couple of years out of date if they're trying to be 'investigative' or is there a brand new Lance angle that merits a story that I'm just not 'getting'? |
Related Threads
- Cheating in amateur sports Apr 2017
- Are you doping? Do you know someone who is? Mar 2017
- Tour De France Aug 2020
- Le Tour 2016 Jul 2016
- Tour de France 2016 Jun 2016
- T\'Tour in otley Apr 2016
- Le Tour 2015 Aug 2015
- Le Tour 2014 Jun 2015
- Tour of Britain Jan 2015
- Womens Tour Of Britain May 2014