Heart rate
301 watchers
Dec 2018
10:43am, 6 Dec 2018
6,200 posts
|
larkim
I've penny pinched and used a Wahoo Tickr for a while - strap is fine, never had any issues with rubbing / chafing on short or long (5hr) races. But I do tend to get too much garbage data associated with static in my tops (on roads where no-one can see me I often lift my top off and see the immediate "correction" of the HR data from something nonsensical (low or high) to a figure which is "right" based on feel. The graphs afterwards bear this out too. Are the more pricey Garmin straps & HRM modules any less sensitive to static issues like that?
|
Dec 2018
10:43am, 6 Dec 2018
65,577 posts
|
Gobi
A strap distracts you, how ?
|
Dec 2018
10:49am, 6 Dec 2018
27,315 posts
|
SPR
It can move and need adjustment while running. Reality is when racing all that matters is how fast I am, the data is a nice to to have rather than necessary, so it's an unnecessary risk.
|
Dec 2018
11:26am, 6 Dec 2018
13,602 posts
|
Chrisull
I must admit I find straps *feel* restrictive on breathing, even if they aren't actually restrictive. Perhaps I'm just temperamental, but I really don't like the feel of something around my chest when working at near maximal effort.
|
Dec 2018
11:33am, 6 Dec 2018
29,719 posts
|
Merry Christmas and Happy NewG(rrr)
It's nearly here, apparently... sciencedaily.com Electronic skin (patch) with Bluetooth... from 2017 so should be a product soon? ![]() |
Dec 2018
11:33am, 6 Dec 2018
20,498 posts
|
fetcheveryone
I find it quite distracting when I get in the shower afterwards and find that it's rubbed half the skin off my chest ![]() |
Dec 2018
11:35am, 6 Dec 2018
29,720 posts
|
Merry Christmas and Happy NewG(rrr)
Actually, there is a product. It's not the thin "skin" I was thinking of, but just more like a stuck on version of the HRM that's on the existing straps. postscapes.com |
Dec 2018
11:44am, 6 Dec 2018
10,107 posts
|
Badger
That one isn't going to happen for sports. That was their original plan a few years ago, then they decided to go for FDA approval as a medical tool instead. dcrainmaker.com |
Dec 2018
11:48am, 6 Dec 2018
29,722 posts
|
Merry Christmas and Happy NewG(rrr)
I had a google to see if I could find one to buy Badger. That explains why not! Thanks. I guess there's more money in medicine than sport/leisure? The difficult thing is, I think what I'm looking for is reliable (not necessarily medical grade, but better than what I'm seeing from OHM) HRM but with wearable convenience. Whereas Fitbit et al are probably that the "steps + something about HR but doesn't really matter what" is "good enough". I wonder when the first legal action against Fitbit (... my hubby dropped dead, but this Fitbit app says "Congratulations, your VO2Max / Fitness Index / Random Number generator says you're doing great and a super healthy" ... ? ![]() I'll keep searching for and possibly put the suggestion in to the likes of Garmin, a better HRM? ![]() |
Dec 2018
12:01pm, 6 Dec 2018
39,657 posts
|
GlennR
We're already there ![]() businesswire.com |
Related Threads
-
Daniels Running Formula. The Definitive Wire. Jul 2023
-
Jack daniels marathon plan help May 2014
-
Polarized training Apr 2024
-
Low Resting/ High Training Heart Rate Jan 2021
-
No limit to the benefits of exercise in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease Jan 2021
-
Resetting Max Heart Rate Dec 2020
-
Resting Heart Rate: Is it normal Oct 2020
-
Heart rate zones Jul 2020
-
Running Heart rate Jun 2020
-
Heart Rate monitors Jun 2020