Cricket Thread

2 lurkers | 108 watchers

Doctor K Aug 2013 10:50am, 21 Aug 2013 2,944 posts	0 Doctor K He's a better spinner than Agar
Crash Hamster Aug 2013 10:52am, 21 Aug 2013 216 posts	0 Crash Hamster Apparently he's coming in at 10; that would surprise me. If he bats worse but bowls better than Agar, I'll be happy. Also, Woakes at 6; no pressure then! I like the balance of this side much better; five batsmen, five bowlers and a wicket keeper. The first (Broad) and fourth (Woakes) seamers, wicket keeper and first spinner all bat. Nice.
Wriggling Snake Aug 2013 11:08am, 21 Aug 2013 4,802 posts	0 Wriggling Snake Woakes yes, Kerrigan no, where's tredders?
Crash Hamster Aug 2013 11:10am, 21 Aug 2013 217 posts	0 Crash Hamster Suppose they want someone to turn it away from the right handers...
Wriggling Snake Aug 2013 11:20am, 21 Aug 2013 4,804 posts	0 Wriggling Snake WICKET!!!! Warner mwah HA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
TRO Saracen Aug 2013 11:22am, 21 Aug 2013 7,824 posts	0 TRO Saracen 11:19 and only one wicket. Poor start from England, unexpected resistance from the Aussie top order.
Wriggling Snake Aug 2013 11:22am, 21 Aug 2013 4,805 posts	0 Wriggling Snake Tuffers just said do the selectors just put the batting order numbers for autralia in hat and just pick it out
lammo Aug 2013 12:24pm, 21 Aug 2013 5,461 posts	0 lammo We must be due to get Watson out shortly.
fraggle Aug 2013 12:35pm, 21 Aug 2013 155 posts	0 fraggle lbw? :-D
TRO Saracen Aug 2013 12:45pm, 21 Aug 2013 7,825 posts	0 TRO Saracen Worth letting watson have a decent knock to ensure he gets picked for the Series in Australia? Long term thinking boys, long term.