Tour De France 2010
20 watchers
Oct 2010
12:40pm, 1 Oct 2010
2,064 posts
|
paul the builder
Lovers, then?
|
Oct 2010
12:43pm, 1 Oct 2010
2,065 posts
|
paul the builder
So, the defence case is food contamination. And also the fact that if anyone was going to use PEDs, why would they use *that* drug, and why in *that* small a quantity. And the prosecution case is, if it's in the body, it's your responsibility. And, maybe you didn't take the Clenbuterol on the date in question, in a miniscule amount, but instead blood-doped that day, with some of your own blood from earlier in the season which *did* have a big pile of Clenbuterol in it. So it's an accidental catch here, the real crime is the blood doping. |
Oct 2010
12:46pm, 1 Oct 2010
2,752 posts
|
Chrisull
So it's looking like he might actually be innocent in this case, I'm guessing. Or... there were residual amounts from an earlier doping and he wasn't expected to be tested down to this "micro" level? Is that also possible? Not that I'd always have to think the worst of anybody. |
Oct 2010
12:48pm, 1 Oct 2010
13,044 posts
|
Velociraptor
Interesting idea, PtB. In a disappointing sort of way
|
Oct 2010
12:58pm, 1 Oct 2010
2,753 posts
|
Chrisull
Ah here's the torpedo that if true blows Contador's alibi out of the water. Other markers in his blood test imply the presence of blood doping. Clenbuturol is banned in meat in all European countries too. road.cc |
Oct 2010
1:13pm, 1 Oct 2010
11,901 posts
|
hammerite
Chris, to pick up on your post from earlier. There were others in the team that ate "the meat" none of them failed though as they weren't tested. Vino was the other one tested, he didn't eat the meat. If they'd all been tested that ate the meat, and they all failed it could back up Contador's case. But it could also show that the whole team doped, depending on which way you looked at it. It's not looking good for Contador regardless. As for Schelck's tweet. He's not the only pro to come out in favour of Contador. I think they're all a little scared, those that aren't doping will be scared that they may do something innocently, or unintentionally, a tiny amount of that is found and then bang it's all over for them. Either reputationally (if they are cleared there'll alway be a suspicion), or they may pay with a ban. Whilst the meat thing does now look unlikely similar things could happen with other drugs - look at Alain Baxter (skier) a couple of years and his Vicks Sinex. |
Oct 2010
1:20pm, 1 Oct 2010
2,068 posts
|
paul the builder
Vrap - not my own idea, plenty of other suspicious folk out there are theorising that. Latest Sports Scientists post is on the subject: sportsscientists.com |
Oct 2010
1:34pm, 1 Oct 2010
11,903 posts
|
hammerite
cyclingnews.com Perhaps I'm just naive/always see the best, but I was starting to think the top guys would be clean as it's too difficult to get away with anything now, and they're tested all the time. |
Oct 2010
1:48pm, 1 Oct 2010
1,455 posts
|
Hohum
Cycling is massively tested but they talk about it too readily to the press before anything is proved or not, giving the impression that cycling is a 'dirty' sport, but almost all sports do it to a greater or lesser degree, it's just their governning bodies don't talk about it to the press. Skiers and runners are often caught but there doesn't seem to be the hoo ha, as in cycling. But watching those mountain stages, it was amazing how fast they were going up hill and almost constantly attacking. When Rasmusen pulled out of the tour due to doping allegations who was with him in the mountains? |
Oct 2010
2:03pm, 1 Oct 2010
11,906 posts
|
hammerite
The problem with using that as an argument = Rasmussen never tested positive, he'd just lied as to where he said he'd been (the other side of the world!), the suspicions and allegations led to him pulling out. He was banned on a technicality a bit like Rio Ferdinand or Christine Ohuro(whatever her name is). Like you say cycling has no more a drugs problem than most sports, it's just drug taking has been going on for a long time, and the sport are trying to do something about it. I think cycling is the only sport that has a blood value passport, most other sports have blatantly refused to take it on. |
Related Threads
- Tour De France Aug 2020
- Le Tour 2016 Jul 2016
- T\'Tour in otley Apr 2016
- Le Tour 2015 Aug 2015
- Le Tour 2014 Jun 2015
- Tour of Britain Jan 2015
- Tour de France 2013 Oct 2013
- So who won the tour from 1999 to 2005 May 2024
- Tour de France 2016 Jun 2016
- Womens Tour Of Britain May 2014