The War in Ukraine
5 lurkers |
43 watchers
21 Oct
8:31pm, 21 Oct 2024
27,597 posts
|
Angus Clydesdale
Have you seen the Nakatomi Towers advent calendar? Hilarious 🤣
|
21 Oct
9:18pm, 21 Oct 2024
29,756 posts
|
richmac
I believe you mean this? |
|
22 Oct
10:37am, 22 Oct 2024
27,599 posts
|
Angus Clydesdale
That’s the badger! 🤣🤣
|
26 Oct
8:04am, 26 Oct 2024
10,557 posts
|
Northern Exile
There's a degree of irony that countries attending the 2024 Brics summit this week voted to adopt the Kazan declaration (named for the capital city of the autonomous republic of Tatarstan in Russia, where the summit is being held). The declaration's first clause emphasises that "all states should act consistently with the Purposes and Principles of the UN Charter in their entirety". There's also a certain amount of chutzpah on the part of conference chair, Vladmir Putin, whose ongoing invasion of Ukraine is so egregiously in breach of that charter. Article one stresses that the primary purpose of the UN is to "maintain international peace and security". Article two rules that: "All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means". If that's not clear enough, it goes on to further insist that: "All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state." Still, its a funny old world in which the UN secretary general, António Guterres, pitches up at a summit whose host is wanted on an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court on charges relating to the alleged illegal deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia. In a country whose troops are currently fighting in Ukraine in direct contravention of the UN's charter. To add a further layer of irony, October 24 is the 79th anniversary of the entry into force of the UN Charter in 1945. Guterres called on Putin to agree a peace deal "in line with the UN Charter, international law and UN General Assembly resolutions". The Russian leader is perhaps more likely to listen to a deal proposed by the Chinese president, Xi Jinping. He said: "We must uphold the three key principles: no expansion of the battlefields, no escalation of hostilities, and no fanning flames and strive for swift de-escalation of the situation." The UN chief's idea of a just peace would call for Russia to give up its illegal occupation of Crimea and eastern Ukraine. Xi's proposal appears to call for a deal based on the status quo – virtually the opposite, in other words. This is pretty much all Ukraine can hope for, as far as the University of Portsmouth's Frank Ledwidge is concerned. Ledwidge, who has written regularly for The Conversation since Putin launched his invasion in February 2024 and is well plugged into defence and intelligence networks in Nato as well as in Ukraine itself, believes that Ukraine cannot defeat Russia – at least as things stand. Ledwidge says Ukraine's western allies are partly to blame for the maximalist aims of the country's president Volodymyr Zelensky. Western rhetoric has not properly been matched by sufficient weapons or the permission to use them as effectively as the situation warrants. Now is the time for realism, he writes: "A starting point could be accepting that Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk are lost ... Then we need to start planning seriously for a post-war Ukraine that will need the west’s suppport more than ever." One of the key factors that Ledwidge stresses is that just one of Russia's allies, North Korea, has supplied twice as many artillery shells this year as the whole of Europe. Now North Korean troops are apparently also about to join their Russian comrades on the battlefield. This, writes Ra Mason – a Korea specialist at the University of East Anglia – will help ease the pressure on Putin to bring forward his mobilisation plans. It's a diplomatic coup for Putin, Mason believes – it's a "clear show of opposition towards the Washington-led global order", which "deals a further blow to the myth that the Russian Federation is isolated, as an international pariah, in a world led by western powers." But a military coup de grace against Ukraine? Probably not. The jury is out on how effective North Korea's "poorly equipped, unmotivated and undernourished" troops will be against Ukraine's highly motivated defenders. It will also be interesting to see where and how they are deployed. If sent to the frontlines in Kursk, they'll be helping an ally in its struggle against an incursion by Ukrainian forces. If deployed inside Ukraine, they'll join Russia in breach of international law. Mason concludes: "If sent into new theatres of war against state-of-the-art Nato-supplied weaponry, it could effectively mean waves of ill-prepared cannon fodder being thrown into the meat grinder of Donbas’ trenches." Incidentally, the term "meat grinder" has been much bandied about of late. It follows reports from US intellegence recently that, while Russian forces have been making rapid advances and gaining a significant amount of ground in recent weeks, they are doing so at considerable cost in terms of dead and wounded. September was a particularly bloody month, with reports of Russian losses of more than 1,000 men a day, killed or wounded. But Russian military strategists are well versed in such pyrrhic victories, writes historian Becky Alexis-Martin, who points to equally savage losses in Russia's defence against Napoleon and in the first and second world wars. Stalin, in particular, was able to defeat the Nazi war machine by, inter alia, throwing millions of troops at their enemies (and incurring terrible casualties). But it's not a strategy that guarantees success. And terrible psychological effects are beginning to manifest themselves in veterans returning from Ukraine with severe and often violent post-traumatic stress disorder. As if things weren't bad enough for Zelensky on the battlefield, the Ukrainian president was dealt a serious blow earlier this month when the US president, Joe Biden, was forced by extreme weather events, including a hurricane hitting the state of Florida, to cancel the planned meeting of the heads of government of up to 50 of Ukraine's western allies in Germany. The "Ramstein Group", so-called after the German air base at which they meet, was scheduled to meet in the second week of October to consider Zelensky's "victory plan". Stefan Wolff, an international security expert at the University of Birmingham writes that the Ukrainian president was hoping to get some degree of commitment for a path to Nato membership for Ukraine as well as permission to use western-supplied long-range missiles against targets deep inside Russia. Neither of these seem likely to happen in the short term, says Wolff. Like Ledwidge, Wolff thinks Ukraine is doomed to defeat unless its allies double down on their aid – and fast. And like Ledwidge, Wolff sees little indication of that happening any time soon. When it comes to continuing US support for Ukraine's war effort, all eyes are now firmly fixed on November 5. The outcome of the presidential election will be seriously consequential for Ukraine's future. Both candidates have made their positions clear and there is considerable difference between the two positions. Donald Trump has said any number of times that had he not lost that "rigged and stolen" election to Biden in 2020, Putin would never have invaded Ukraine in the first place. Still, he says, if he wins this one, he'll bring the war to a very rapid conclusion. But it remains to be seen, given Trump's oft-stated admiration for Putin, whether the conclusion will be palatable to Kyiv – or to Nato in general. Trump's opponent, Kamala Harris, said the former president's proposals are not "proposals for peace, they're proposals for surrender". As vice-president during the Biden administration, she flew to Europe not long after the invasion in February 2022 to help shore up support for Kyiv. Harris has also regularly restated her intention to continue to back Ukraine against Russia. In the only debate of the campaign she said that Ukraine was not Putin’s final stop and that he has “his eyes on the rest of Europe, starting with Poland”. Poland, incidentally, is an interesting case in point. While it is Ukraine's firmest ally and it leadership is four-square behind Kyiv, the people are curiously divided on the country's support for Ukraine. You can read more about that here. One imagines that Zelensky is as transfixed as anyone else on the 2024 US presidential election campaign as it heads into its final ten days. All we can tell you is that the polls are still very, very close. Well within most pollsters' margin for error, in fact. A poll of polls, which combines polls from different agencies, published on the website FiveThirtyEight on October 22 shows that Harris leads Trump by 48.1% to 46.3% in the national popular vote. But the accepted popular wisdom is that the complex electoral college system used in the US may well favour Trump's candidacy. |
|
26 Oct
8:46am, 26 Oct 2024
29,817 posts
|
richmac
At the moment, it seems that Anne decisions on Ukraine are pended till the US election is done.
|
26 Oct
9:56am, 26 Oct 2024
3,532 posts
|
Muttley
A depressing read. The UK has systematically run down its Russia expertise over the past couple of decades and without those experts has not fully understood the Kremlin's descent into fascism and violent authoritarianism. It is beginning to realize now but it's lagging behind. If Russia conquers or just holds on to what it has of Ukraine, it will gain control over major commodity flows. Ukraine has some of the richest farm land in the world and there are rare earth mineral deposits in Donbas, useful for future green technologies. It's not only about the land and people. |
|
26 Oct
10:01am, 26 Oct 2024
29,818 posts
|
richmac
You mean it's all about money and influence and not any higher purpose? I cannot believe any politician would do that. |
|
29 Oct
9:16am, 29 Oct 2024
3,536 posts
|
Muttley
Interesting analysis of the state of the Russian economy as the Ukraine invasion grinds on. archive.ph |
|
29 Oct
9:59am, 29 Oct 2024
10,576 posts
|
Northern Exile
There's been a few reports like this circulating hasn't there? It may ultimately be the declining economy that swings the balance of opinion inside Russia.
|
|
29 Oct
10:19am, 29 Oct 2024
29,856 posts
|
richmac
If you flick your eyes across glennR's blog he's posted a link to the register showing a story about a huge sewage spume in Moscow they state it may have been caused by Ukrainian cuber warfare messing with the drainage system or a result of much of Russias infrastructure being old & over worked. Official line is that it's a planned release caused by a build up of gas |
Related Threads
-
Helping Refugees
Apr 2022
-
🇺🇦 Ukraine Red Cross - a way WE can help.
Mar 2022