for an ad-free Fetcheveryone experience!

So who won the tour from 1999 to 2005

80 watchers

larkim Mar 2024 3:05pm, 7 Mar 2024 23,454 posts	Quote Pin larkim athleticsweekly.com Kate Carter cleared by England Athletics of not doing much wrong, or if she did not with any malicious intent.
jda Mar 2024 3:17pm, 7 Mar 2024 16,650 posts	Quote Pin jda Establishment looks after its own shock horror.
Chrisull Mar 2024 3:24pm, 7 Mar 2024 21,204 posts	Quote Pin Chrisull More like they can't definitively prove malicious intent, and so they bow out. And yes she didn't win anything, so there was never doing much wrong. But it was falsifying results and deliberately falsifying results.
paulcook Mar 2024 3:46pm, 7 Mar 2024 4,415 posts	Quote Pin paulcook And if she wasn't editor, or some such similarly-worded position, of Runner's World, I'd be a bit "meh". But as she is, it all seems a rather poor outcome.
Derby Tup Mar 2024 4:06pm, 7 Mar 2024 64,833 posts	Quote Pin Derby Tup Very poor
SPR Mar 2024 4:17pm, 7 Mar 2024 43,772 posts	Quote Pin SPR We need to discard the London Marathon from any discussion. The HM is an open and shut case with the why being mitigation.
auburnette Mar 2024 4:38pm, 7 Mar 2024 2,257 posts	Quote Pin auburnette The AW article says LLHM invited her back with a message of support?!?!?! Why on earth? Makes me think very poorly of them and won't be looking to do that race in future...
57.5 Days of Pain Mar 2024 4:48pm, 7 Mar 2024 17,369 posts	Quote Pin 57.5 Days of Pain I'm failing to understand why England Athletics would do anything about what would be a minor matter other than her job and her social media presence. It's up to her employer to decide whether her role impacts their reputation and their advertising revenue, and her social media audience to decide whether to continue their belief in her as a positive 'influencer'.
57.5 Days of Pain Mar 2024 4:50pm, 7 Mar 2024 17,370 posts	Quote Pin 57.5 Days of Pain And up to the race organisers involved to show some backbone and sanction her of course.
SPR Mar 2024 7:55pm, 7 Mar 2024 43,775 posts	Quote Pin SPR If the governing body knows about someone cheating, the normal thing isn't to shrug. I imagine most of the time they don't. At minimum there should be something saying this isn't expected behaviour when you do a race. I actually believe she didn't plan to cheat and likely cut the course by accident but she did pretend she'd run the time in the HM after the event when she knew she hadn't and left it in the results rather than inform the organisers. At minimum you'd expect something saying this isn't what we expect you to do when you run a race and use the story to publicise expected conduct