Dec 2007
4:51pm, 13 Dec 2007
1,638 posts
|
Rach E
It's only a suggestion! But it's the one that correlated best over the current predicted times. People will have to be honest though.
|
Dec 2007
4:54pm, 13 Dec 2007
5,920 posts
|
Hills of Death (HOD)
It's a very good idea (similar to mine except I thought there was going to be hundreds of people ! )
|
Dec 2007
5:03pm, 13 Dec 2007
688 posts
|
abdou
Nice work Rach. It sounds to me like people are being realistic or even a bit negative about their times so that should make for a decent breakdown.
|
Dec 2007
5:04pm, 13 Dec 2007
11,382 posts
|
B.B.
Happy with that. I was going to do it on the day as lots of people might not turn up, etc, but that grouping seems fine to me
|
Dec 2007
5:09pm, 13 Dec 2007
490 posts
|
Tpod
Dammit Ang! I was hoping to race by myself! Now I'm going to have to put some effort in to finish near the front:-)
|
Dec 2007
5:10pm, 13 Dec 2007
17,054 posts
|
Gobi
WHAT NO SUB 5 GROUP !!!!!!
|
Dec 2007
5:14pm, 13 Dec 2007
11,384 posts
|
B.B.
4:59 is quicker than 5:59, gobshite
|
Dec 2007
5:17pm, 13 Dec 2007
10,453 posts
|
Hoaxster
Have you seen JEJ's prediction?
|
Dec 2007
5:20pm, 13 Dec 2007
492 posts
|
Tpod
3:59...LOL
I would be honoured to watch a sub-4 min mile in person! I'll stick to a 7:30 and some dry retching near the track if it's ok with everyone
|
Dec 2007
5:25pm, 13 Dec 2007
11,386 posts
|
B.B.
I suspect mr JEJ is having us on. I'd like to see it though...
|