|
Dec 2020
9:29pm, 15 Dec 2020
1,529 posts
|
rhb
If you subscribe you can have the computer analyse more than 1 game per day? I can't usually see much new on self analysis, too short an attention span!
|
|
Dec 2020
10:46pm, 15 Dec 2020
2,020 posts
|
monsenb1
"you should have taken his knightâs pawn on move 5 with it & won his rook" omg I didn't see that either...
|
|
Dec 2020
10:56pm, 15 Dec 2020
1,530 posts
|
rhb
If my last opening book move was move 6 then I'm demanding a new book!
Another interesting position versus mr d is coming to an end as I've found the forced mate line in that game now, there was a very congested corner for a while which I was able to use to my advantage just now.
|
|
Dec 2020
11:14pm, 15 Dec 2020
26,483 posts
|
Maclennane
Getting tense with RHB now. I'd be interested to see how the computer judges it
|
|
Dec 2020
11:39pm, 15 Dec 2020
1,531 posts
|
rhb
Yup, I'm defo on the ropes. Perhaps should have accepted the draw offer on reflection.
|
|
Dec 2020
11:44pm, 15 Dec 2020
26,484 posts
|
Maclennane
I'm sure you're a lovely chap rhb (I think we've met) but I don't trust a word out of your highly-rated mouth 
|
|
Dec 2020
11:49pm, 15 Dec 2020
17,028 posts
|
Chrisull
Goofee - No to your question. It's an essay in its own right. Computers play very differently to humans (in fact far less fun to play against), they see things that humans don't/rarely do and can completely crush you with unpromising lines, or throw their pieces away at the first hint of trouble, after playing perfectly sensibly. You end up adapting your game plan to meet/beat theirs.
|
|
Dec 2020
11:57pm, 15 Dec 2020
1,532 posts
|
rhb
^^ reminds me, is there a Poker thread on Fetch forums?
|
|
Dec 2020
11:59pm, 15 Dec 2020
1,533 posts
|
rhb
I'm not sure we have met though? I'd need reminding where. Sorry. I've not met many from here in all these years tbh.
|
|
Dec 2020
12:08am, 16 Dec 2020
26,485 posts
|
Maclennane
My mistake, similar moniker to a chap from Winchester
|
