|
Jul 2013
2:08pm, 19 Jul 2013
3,647 posts
|
HermanBloom
Hopefully that wicket means the dropped catch doesn't bite us on the bum.
|
|
Jul 2013
2:29pm, 19 Jul 2013
7,712 posts
|
TRO Saracen
Left for the gym with the Aussie openers beginning to settle and play for lunch and feeling a bit grouchy about our performance in this test; get back and three are back in the hutch! Lovely.
Although it's really 2, as that walking wicket Hughes doesn;t really count. Sure we only let him dib around for 80 odd at Trent Brodge just to keep him in the side....
|
|
Jul 2013
2:29pm, 19 Jul 2013
13,250 posts
|
fetcheveryone
Well done Kev 
|
|
Jul 2013
2:30pm, 19 Jul 2013
2,207 posts
|
Musical Journey
This was supposed to be a batting wicket?!
|
|
Jul 2013
2:30pm, 19 Jul 2013
3,648 posts
|
HermanBloom
Yeah the openers looked quite settled after the first couple of overs, now the team looks a mess. Odd game. Again.
|
|
Jul 2013
2:47pm, 19 Jul 2013
13,251 posts
|
fetcheveryone
Watson played around it, Rogers was a freak dismissal, Khawaja panicked, and Hughes played an awful waft away from his body. They've mostly got themselves out.
Good innit
|
|
Jul 2013
2:50pm, 19 Jul 2013
7,713 posts
|
TRO Saracen
Yeah, but as someone on the Guardian OBO pointed out, that's the tail gone, but the real hard work to get the proper batsmen out now begins....
|
|
Jul 2013
2:54pm, 19 Jul 2013
2,115 posts
|
Dooogs
What would an Australian batting order based on series performances to date look like?
Agar
Haddin
Rogers
Clarke
Pattinson
Hughes
Smith
Watson
Siddle
Starc
Khawaja
XIIth man: Cowan
|
|
Jul 2013
2:55pm, 19 Jul 2013
2,116 posts
|
Dooogs
Heh, the site formatting deleted the 15 blank lines between Khawaja and Cowan...
|
|
Jul 2013
2:58pm, 19 Jul 2013
3,649 posts
|
HermanBloom
Was about to say that I want Clarke removed asap, but if his batting partners don't hang around very long then it might not make much odds.
|
