Feb 2014
11:08pm, 13 Feb 2014
755 posts
|
HayleyB
Like Only question is that power data is being picked from my Edge (shows i the graph on the right) but it does not appear as a selectable option in the big graph at the top??
|
Feb 2014
11:09pm, 13 Feb 2014
756 posts
|
HayleyB
Oops - finger trouble - it is selectable now. *walks away whistling* That would be just a 'like' then.
|
Feb 2014
11:06am, 14 Feb 2014
1,344 posts
|
Windsor Wool
Sorry Fetch, I'm just not getting it. Let met try with the data...
I did stop my watch for a period in the miles that look out. Does this mean, perhaps, that the calcs are refering to some real time reference rather than an elapsed time basis?
Garmin splits for last nights’ run.
1)1m - 8:24(8:24/m) 139/164bpm 74cal 3.19/4.24/hr 2) 1m - 7:45(7:45/m) 153/176bpm 72cal 3.46/4.16/hr 3) 1m - 7:16(7:16/m) 149/155bpm 79cal 3.69/5.03/hr 4) 1m - 7:49(7:49/m) 144/153bpm 79cal 3.44/3.84/hr 5) 1m - 8:08(8:08/m) 153/166bpm 89cal 3.3/3.6/hr 6) 1m - 7:18(7:18/m) 150/159bpm 78cal 3.67/4.05/hr 7) 1m - 7:22(7:22/m) 154/160bpm 81cal 3.64/4.15/hr 8) 1m - 7:22(7:22/m) 155/165bpm 80cal 3.64/4.89/hr 9) 1m - 7:51(7:51/m) 148/156bpm 75cal 3.42/4.17/hr 10) 1m - 8:00(8:00/m) 148/153bpm 81cal 3.35/7.11/hr 11) 1m - 7:59(7:59/m) 149/152bpm 82cal 3.36/3.88/hr 12) 1m - 8:09(8:09/m) 150/154bpm 78cal 3.29/4.45/hr 13) 0.01m - 6(8:14/m) 150/151bpm 1cal 3.26/3.35/hr
HR splits per the summary. It has me 'running' a 14 min mile at one point.
1. 8:24 137 (164) 1166 2. 12:50 148 (176) 1577 3. 7:17 148 (155) 1082 4. 9:02 142 (153) 1252 5. 8:07 153 (165) 1240 6. 7:19 150 (159) 1095 7. 7:23 154 (160) 1139 8. 7:21 155 (165) 1138 9. 13:53 145 (155) 1732 10. 8:01 148 (153) 1187 11. 7:58 149 (152) 1185 12. 9:00 149 (154) 1324
|
Feb 2014
11:15am, 14 Feb 2014
14,034 posts
|
fetcheveryone
Yes it's real time.
|
Feb 2014
11:37am, 14 Feb 2014
10 posts
|
boyband6666
The new displays are actually brilliant. More like trainign peaks, but without the faff and costs. I love it. Not a single thing is worsened - thankyou!
|
Feb 2014
11:52am, 14 Feb 2014
153 posts
|
PerfectOrganism
I like the new layout. It's very informative and easy on the eye.
Just a couple of points for improvement.
1) It would be nice to see the pace bands in both grapical and numerical (as they were before) format.
2) My splits on the garmin don't match those on the split breaker (although I do like this new feature).
3) It would be handy to be able to select the route that you've ran from within the training page itself, rather than having to come out and edit the entry afterwards to include your saved route (minor point, but thought i'd include it anyway!).
Cheers!
|
Feb 2014
1:20pm, 14 Feb 2014
1,345 posts
|
Windsor Wool
Thanks for the clarification Fetch. PO - I think you are pointing out the same issue as I have (your point 3).
Does this feed through to all HR calculations in the training log? Does this mean that any run where one pauses or stops their watch for a period the HR data will be skewed? Hoping not and that I can continue to trust the data in the old training page. Thanks.
|
Feb 2014
1:41pm, 14 Feb 2014
14,035 posts
|
fetcheveryone
Which ones are you concerned about?
|
Feb 2014
1:47pm, 14 Feb 2014
159 posts
|
missvivvy
I've read through the thread and I don't think this has been raised.....(sorry if it has)
In the training log view, in my list of runs under the terrain option the total ascent/descent no longer shows. If I click the glasses view for a specific run the ascent/descent data is there. I liked being able to compare all my runs in the training log view for ascent/descent as I am training for very hilly stuff.
I would like the route map larger in the glasses view, but maybe that's just the geographer in me.........
|
Feb 2014
1:48pm, 14 Feb 2014
1,347 posts
|
Windsor Wool
Sorry, I tried to snag a pic but I can't work that!
I'm thinking of the numbers in the training summary that I see when I click on 'Heart'. I think I see avg, max, %MHR, %WHR, beats per mile.
Was wondering if these (specifically the beats per mile I suppose) would be skewed? I suppose that these are just the easy ways that I track progress - looking at general trends across a series of runs rather than wanting to look at the fine specifics of one run.
Thanks and apologies.
|