|
Nov 2018
7:48pm, 18 Nov 2018
16,952 posts
|
Dvorak
Fine for me on mobile. Could be that Chris"s giant link was throwing something off. Should be on a new page now 
|
|
Nov 2018
8:24pm, 18 Nov 2018
20,179 posts
|
fetcheveryone
Might be browser specific.
|
|
Nov 2018
9:44am, 19 Nov 2018
29,563 posts
|
HappyG(rrr)
It always happens (on my desktop / browser combo) when there is a mega long text string (e.g. v. long link) with no space/ breaks in it.
Does anyone experience quite a long lag (I'm Garmin Vivoactive 3 with optical HRM) in HR figures e.g. intervals, or sets of non-running, or a standing break in a longer run. Or even a harder uphill, vs easy recovery section on a run?
I want to see if my HR is settling back after a bit of effort. If it comes straight back but HRM is taking ages to show the figures, that's a bit useless. Is it just the software trying to smooth the data? Or is it inherent in optical HRM? Can I set "refresh rate" or something for it to show more "real time"?
Thanks, G
|
|
Nov 2018
10:12am, 19 Nov 2018
2,918 posts
|
steve45
it WAS on desk top...but this morning it's suddenly become ok again! Thanks for input folks.
I'm struggling with effort/HR and pace right now. Looking to having a week long break at the end of the month --thinking I'm tired in some way but can't really be because of miles (only do 25 a week) so it must be mental!
|
|
Nov 2018
12:47pm, 20 Nov 2018
2,924 posts
|
steve45
I recall, and what everyone knows, that recovery within five minutes to normal heart rate is also and indication of a healthy heart or at least shows that you haven't overcooked a run. But..I also recall in my racing days that if I'd run my guts out then my HR would be elevated for several hours afterwards--and I used to feel awful!
|
|
Nov 2018
12:48pm, 20 Nov 2018
65,410 posts
|
Gobi
Steve
Recovery from an effort is often a better indication of fitness than doing the session
G
|
|
Nov 2018
1:39pm, 20 Nov 2018
18,002 posts
|
flanker
That's why I'm just doing the recovery bit
|
|
Nov 2018
10:56am, 21 Nov 2018
2,926 posts
|
steve45
I think I'll have a go at that flanker!
|
|
Nov 2018
10:57am, 21 Nov 2018
2,927 posts
|
steve45
I'll make note of that Gobi. Cheers.
|
|
Nov 2018
11:35am, 21 Nov 2018
6,066 posts
|
larkim
What I've read (and matches the Garmin approach) is to look at HR recovery 2 minutes after activity. I've read / heard that monitoring the recovery from a moderate level of exertion is a good way of keeping track - something which puts you into 60-80% max for a short period of time. And then monitor the difference between when you stop and 2 minutes later.
|
