Mar 2022
8:18pm, 4 Mar 2022
21,559 posts
|
ChrisHB
we tried referring to our first by the name we'd chosen for her, but it didn't work for either of us. Anyway we swapped her first and second names round after the event.
|
Mar 2022
8:22pm, 4 Mar 2022
53,310 posts
|
LindsD
We didn't want to know but wouldn't have been able to anyhow as it's prohibited in our trust.
|
Mar 2022
8:46pm, 4 Mar 2022
16,373 posts
|
JK *chameleon*
My sister referred to her first-born as Bobkat.
The resultant niece has turned into a cat-hater, and as such a huge disappointment (although that personality flaw aside, a lovely young lady)
|
Mar 2022
9:01pm, 4 Mar 2022
24,848 posts
|
Dvorak
I thought that referring to baby as "it" got a sharp retort - although may that's just after it, I mean she or he, has been hatched.
I'm trying to think what term I've used pre-hatching. "Sprout" maybe, or "bump".
|
Mar 2022
5:50pm, 7 Mar 2022
4,322 posts
|
Cyclops
My cousin's baby got nicknamed Montana in utero and ended up being called it as they couldn't imagine her with any other name once born.
|
Mar 2022
3:04pm, 14 Mar 2022
9,017 posts
|
GordonG
i've just received a work email containing the phrase "We wanted to sense check this with you and also confirm..."
question: what does 'sense check' mean? does it add anything more than simply 'check'?
|
Mar 2022
3:19pm, 14 Mar 2022
17,340 posts
|
larkim
Doesn't check imply authorisation or permission, whereas sense check suggests the application of common sense to something?
|
Mar 2022
4:06pm, 14 Mar 2022
21,585 posts
|
ChrisHB
they're asking if it makes sense.
|
Mar 2022
4:22pm, 14 Mar 2022
9,018 posts
|
GordonG
Ok thanks. I think you're right although ironically, when you read the whole email, it doesn't really make sense!
|
Mar 2022
7:53pm, 14 Mar 2022
21,654 posts
|
Columba
Yes, check the sense. As opposed, for example, to the grammar or the spelling.
|