for an ad-free Fetcheveryone experience!

Cricket Thread

3 lurkers | 108 watchers

Crash Hamster Jul 2013 3:12pm, 10 Jul 2013 183 posts	0 Crash Hamster I reckon that batting first was done to avoid batting fourth. Possible parity after first innings, then Australia to have to chase 270 on a turning pitch in the fourth.
HellsBells Jul 2013 3:30pm, 10 Jul 2013 15,667 posts	0 HellsBells Oh dear
TRO Saracen Jul 2013 3:34pm, 10 Jul 2013 7,691 posts	0 TRO Saracen Disaster. 1-0 to Australia.
Endorphins Junky Jul 2013 3:36pm, 10 Jul 2013 2,184 posts	0 Endorphins Junky Shocking!
TRO Saracen Jul 2013 3:50pm, 10 Jul 2013 7,692 posts	0 TRO Saracen Got to think about recalling Monty for Lord's - to stiffen the batting line up....
Nelly Jul 2013 3:53pm, 10 Jul 2013 1,072 posts	0 Nelly TRO - I was wondering whether your post 7691 was missing a winky face. I don't think anybody will be wondering the same about post 7692
Wriggling Snake Jul 2013 4:31pm, 10 Jul 2013 4,545 posts	0 Wriggling Snake it is not 1-0 yet, England will get 500 in their second knock, after bowling them out cheaply too. Seriously, I will see some good england batting on Friday
postieboy Jul 2013 4:44pm, 10 Jul 2013 1,914 posts	0 postieboy That was pathetic by England. Lets hope the bowlers get them out of jail
HellsBells Jul 2013 5:16pm, 10 Jul 2013 15,668 posts	0 HellsBells That's a bit better
Frobester Jul 2013 5:24pm, 10 Jul 2013 23,129 posts	0 Frobester Oh I say.