for an ad-free Fetcheveryone experience!

Cricket Thread

5 lurkers | 108 watchers

TRO Saracen Aug 2019 9:10pm, 19 Aug 2019 19,428 posts	Quote Pin TRO Saracen Was Tuffers a worse batsman or fielder? The Caddick-Tuffers-Mullally-Giddins attack was reckoned to be the worst tail end we ever put out. 4 no 11s, and 4 properly shit no 11s at that...
Oscar the grouch Aug 2019 9:17pm, 19 Aug 2019 1,076 posts	Quote Pin Oscar the grouch Caddick high score 49 not out (Tests), Tufnell 22 not out (5 not out in ODIs!), Mullally 24, Giddins 7 (from 4 Tests). Test wickets 234, 121, 58, 12. Caddick not as bad as all that in fairness but nobody's idea of a number 8 Test batsman.
postieboy Aug 2019 9:46pm, 19 Aug 2019 6,101 posts	Quote Pin postieboy Caddick could bat well when he was in the mood. Most of the time he wasn't. Bit like his bowling. Either unplayable or buffet bowling, no in between.
TRO Saracen Aug 2019 9:56pm, 19 Aug 2019 19,429 posts	Quote Pin TRO Saracen I can’t really remember much about Caddick batting other than he just looked wrong.
Wriggling Snake Aug 2019 10:19pm, 19 Aug 2019 23,693 posts	Quote Pin Wriggling Snake You could still see he had big ears. Even with a Helmet on. Tuffers was a very, very good bowler. Giddens and Mulally weren't.
TRO Saracen Aug 2019 10:27pm, 19 Aug 2019 19,430 posts	Quote Pin TRO Saracen Mullally and Giddins would be in my archetypal County trundler attack. Igglesdon and Agnew complete the quartet.
SPR Aug 2019 10:43pm, 19 Aug 2019 29,025 posts	Quote Pin SPR Mullally was ok, not terrible anyway.
SPR Aug 2019 10:47pm, 19 Aug 2019 29,026 posts	Quote Pin SPR No Ilott, Bicknell, Martin?
SPR Aug 2019 10:48pm, 19 Aug 2019 29,027 posts	Quote Pin SPR Or McCague? Lol.
Darlo Aug 2019 10:49pm, 19 Aug 2019 72 posts	Quote Pin Darlo Tuffers was average at best