Mar 2017
3:56pm, 21 Mar 2017
60,231 posts
|
Gobi
ps. 118 is around 55% using Karvonnen
a lot of my watt bike sessions are sub 100 hr
|
Mar 2017
4:00pm, 21 Mar 2017
91,194 posts
|
GregP
66 Glenn? Really? That's high. Mine's 52 (HRM 186)
|
Mar 2017
4:13pm, 21 Mar 2017
60,232 posts
|
Gobi
wow
lowest was 37 currently anywhere from there to 43 data calculated off 40 and 182
|
Mar 2017
4:15pm, 21 Mar 2017
26,048 posts
|
GlennR
50.
Easy enough using goal seek.
|
Mar 2017
4:17pm, 21 Mar 2017
26,049 posts
|
GlennR
Incidentally, the max is not a red herring - you need it to work out the WHR range.
|
Mar 2017
4:36pm, 21 Mar 2017
91,196 posts
|
GregP
Remind me again in the morning GR - I'll have a play.
|
Mar 2017
4:50pm, 21 Mar 2017
11,628 posts
|
Fenland (Fenners) Runner
Pretty much consistent at 43 bpm while asleep. Wore the HRM 24x7. Calculated max by the scientists 176 bpm but I think that is a conservative figure.
|
Mar 2017
6:03pm, 21 Mar 2017
60,233 posts
|
Gobi
31 seen in data after wearing HRM in bed
FR - left some HR and run pace data on the other page for you
|
Mar 2017
6:16pm, 21 Mar 2017
23,661 posts
|
SPR
MHR = 118/0.68 = 174 nearest whole number WHR = (174-118)/0.45 = 124 nearest whole number.
RHR = 174-124
😀
|
Mar 2017
6:17pm, 21 Mar 2017
23,662 posts
|
SPR
Which = 50 obviously.
|