|
Jan 2017
10:22am, 3 Jan 2017
4,198 posts
|
Hark the Helegant Angels Sing
Thanks for highlighting that view. It shows me that I didn't record my C2C on Fetch, and various bits of other walks are missing. According to Conquercise I've never visited the Peak District. Must try harder to record the locations as well as time and distance...
|
|
Jan 2017
8:44pm, 4 Jan 2017
1,305 posts
|
NDWDave
Yes over a year ago. I ran the Thames path to Oxford this year but my garmin lost the Richmond to reading bit
|
|
Jan 2017
5:58pm, 7 Jan 2017
1,341 posts
|
NDWDave
The HD version of the conquersize map
ChrisHB - what does yours look like?
|
|
Jan 2017
8:30pm, 7 Jan 2017
14,378 posts
|
ChrisHB
It breaks my browser! Something else is broken, because I had nearly 100,000 hexagons in the past 10 years, but only 99,000 in the past 17 years.
Anyone would think I hadn't completed the London LOOP, or that there were chunks of the Thames Path and NDW missing. In fact, there are nine significant strings missing, from memory.
|
|
Jan 2017
7:59am, 8 Jan 2017
4,791 posts
|
Ceratonia
This is the training log map, rather than conquercise, isn't it? I have lots of loops rather than the long strings you have. I've only logged running not walks, so things like Peddars Way/North Norfolk Coast & Oxfam Trailwalker/South Downs Way are not shown.
|
|
Jan 2017
8:03am, 8 Jan 2017
4,792 posts
|
Ceratonia
And this is conquercise zones to the same scale - harder to spot individual races away from home. The Oxford half marathon is easy to see as a squiggle above, not so easy as a couple of grey dots below.
|
|
Jan 2017
8:13am, 8 Jan 2017
1,349 posts
|
NDWDave
Yes - it is from the training log. It shows a bit more detail about where activities have been logged
|
|
Jan 2017
9:14am, 8 Jan 2017
16,740 posts
|
flanker
the 'octagon' map definitely seems to be a bit buggy. I'm missing areas from it and have isolated octagons that I know should be connected up.
If it was just the odd one I'd say it was a dodgy GPS point, but to get so many mid-run seems unlikely.
|
|
Jan 2017
7:15pm, 9 Jan 2017
10,808 posts
|
Bazoaxe
I know that you only get credit for running through a zone once per day, even if you run through it more than once. I have lost a zone adjacent to my home zone in the last 2 weeks and it seems its to someone who run and cycles in that zone each day and so can pick up extra points.
Doesnt feel fair, if I only get credit for one of my 2 runs, then a run and cycle should only get credit for the highest scoring, i.e run 
|
|
Jan 2017
9:48pm, 9 Jan 2017
13,373 posts
|
Seratonin
Cyclists can also cover more zones during their allotted period of exercise.
|
