Hi ,
It looks like you're using an ad blocker.



The revenue generated from the adverts on the site is a critical part of our funding - and it's because of these ads that I can offer the site for free. But using the site for free AND blocking the ads doesn't feel like a great thing to do, which is why this box is so large and inconvenient. Some sites will completely block your access, but I'm not doing that - I'm appealing to your good nature instead. Did you know that you can allow ads for specific sites, whilst still blocking them on others?

Thanks,
Ian Williams aka Fetch

F'Laps - Saturday 5th July

Join in with our challenge this Saturday. Run a set distance every hour until you can't run any more!
or for an ad-free Fetcheveryone experience!

The vaporfly thread

87 watchers
Mar 2020
9:16pm, 4 Mar 2020
7,226 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
chunkywizard
Apparently Alphaflys from the US trails are now on eBay, selling for upto $1000. Anyone feeling rich?
Mar 2020
9:52pm, 10 Mar 2020
202 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
speedy rob
Here's a possible explanation for top ladies not consistently racing in Next% trainers (may apply to other Nike trainers)... nike.com

The Nike next% trainers all have the same thickness carbon plate, but the alpha fly plate stiffness scales with shoe size: more flexible for smaller sizes and stiffer for larger shoes.

So lighter weight athletes in smaller size shoes (like me at 58kg in size 6.5) won't get enough flex in the plate for optimum energy return due to less force and reduced leverage. Similarly, heavier athletes in larger shoe sizes won't get optimum energy return due to the plate flexing too easily.
Mar 2020
10:55am, 11 Mar 2020
341 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
icenutter
Sounds plausible
ITG
Mar 2020
12:01pm, 11 Mar 2020
8,621 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
ITG
I didn't quite get that, Rob. Is it the Next% that is likely to have similar impacts for all sizes/weights or the Alphafly?
Mar 2020
12:29pm, 11 Mar 2020
10,580 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
larkim
I think Rob is pointing out that the Next% doesn't allow for a different weights (hence women arguably responding less well), whereas the AlphaFly apparently does address that.
ITG
Mar 2020
12:35pm, 11 Mar 2020
8,622 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
ITG
I'm light but have big feet (42.5 in running shoes) and Next%. No idea if that is good or bad. Poss worst of both worlds? Boh
Mar 2020
12:42pm, 11 Mar 2020
1,018 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Roberto
I thought about that weeks ago and was discussing it with a couple from my club about whether because I have size 10 feet and weigh 12 stone, the impact will be bigger for me than a woman with size 5 feet and weighs 6 stone.

But I'm not particularly mathematical so had no idea on the impacts of feet size or weight on it.
SPR
Mar 2020
1:06pm, 11 Mar 2020
29,973 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
SPR
I still think this is more to do with sponsorship variety. It's not that Nike runners are shunning the shoe.

The women's marathon record has still been broken because of the next.

It's possible the benefit might be less though and given the shoes were all about sub 2 it makes sense that they may not be optimally tuned for women.
SPR
Mar 2020
1:10pm, 11 Mar 2020
29,974 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
SPR
In theory the shoes are optimally tuned for Kipchoge. Possibly high profile athletes like Bekele also have their own tuned models (not sure how far down the line of athletes tuning would go).
Mar 2020
6:35pm, 13 Mar 2020
15,829 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Chrisull
So this week after my disastrous HM, I decided do a simple comparison. Two days, same target but in different shoes to see if I am a VF non-responder.

Downhill mile. So morning, no breakfast, same warmups, run at lunch time, one mile warmup, one mile downhill, one cooldown. Weather conditions broadly the same for both days.

The downhill mile is a mile at full pelt, basically I can't do more.

In VF 4%'s 5.53.8 (which is pretty poor, I was doing it in 5.08 same route last year).

And not in VF's next day...

5.53.9.

The only difference was my HR which was admittedly 6 beats higher for the mile, and maxing out 6 beats higher.... BUT nowhere near my max (max HR 154 out 176 is comfortably nowehere near), BUT we're not talking about something that will make a difference over longer distances, but whether I am faster in the VF's or not.

I have run 5 races in all distances from 5 miles to marathon now and every single time I have been slower by quite some way. While I think I'm not as fast/fit (but I should be, same training is involved), I've suspected that the VF's give me a modest (1%?) boost uphill but I am no faster in them on the flat or downhill. I conclude I am low to non-responder.

Now if I could source my favourite Puma H streets to see how they compare... When I first started wearing them, I knocked 3 minutes off my 10k time, in a month.

About This Thread

Maintained by Windsor Wool
somewhere to talk about fast shoes whether you like / believe in them or not

The world has changed a lot since this thread began. Choose your weapon here:

certcheck.worldathletics.org
  • Show full description...

Related Threads

  • kit
  • nike
  • shoes

Report This Content

You can report any content you believe to be unsafe. Please let me know why you believe this content is unsafe by choosing a category below.



Thank you for your report. The content will be assessed as soon as possible.










Back To Top

Tag A User

To tag a user, start typing their name here:
X

Free training & racing tools for runners, cyclists, swimmers & walkers.

Fetcheveryone lets you analyse your training, find races, plot routes, chat in our forum, get advice, play games - and more! Nothing is behind a paywall, and it'll stay that way thanks to our awesome community!
Get Started
Click here to join 114,481 Fetchies!
Already a Fetchie? Sign in here