I think you are in the same place as us (or at least me, Glenn and Spouter and Tom) Hamm.
Understand the theory, fail to understand why it is so different in practice: I'm still alarmed about strava giving different (sometimes higher, sometimes lower) maximum speeds.
If we, for one moment, assume Garmin Connect (and the unit itself) interprets its own data 'incorrectly', then the 'next most likely' candidate for getting it 'right' would (I'd argue) be Training Peaks.
Which comes out with the same numbers as GC, Fetch and, I believe, RuniningOnionsFriedOnSaturday
Hammerite made a good point - I wonder if strava was just using the GPS signal and ignoring data from a speed/cadence sensor (assuming you have one)? There's every chance that the data from GPS and the speed sensor could be different, especially in a GPS blackspot.
A sort of 'Why FetchEveryone is better than STRAVA' wire. ----
Last Sunday I cycled to church.
My Fetch log, which I trust beyond all possibility of doubt, tells me this:
17.07 miles, 1h19m46s, max speed 30.3mph
Garmin Connect, which one assumes is closest to the raw data, tells me this:
17.07 miles, 1h19m46s, max speec 30.3mph
This makes me very happy.
Now, gentle Fetchies, you may have seen or read or experienced strava recently, and been tempted, as I was, to 'dabble' and see whether it might be fun. strava taking data from the same source (my Garmin EDGE 800) tells me this.
Free training & racing tools for runners, cyclists, swimmers & walkers.
Fetcheveryone lets you analyse your training, find races, plot routes, chat in our forum, get advice, play games - and more!
Nothing is behind a paywall, and it'll stay that way thanks to our awesome community!