
Heart rate
1 lurker |
302 watchers
3 Feb
4:51pm, 3 Feb 2025
26,537 posts
|
larkim
When HRMs work, they are all more than good enough for runners I think. Chest straps seem to be considered by many as some "gold standard" even though counting 150 beats in a minute is just as easy for an optical device to do as a chest strap; arm bands are 100% the best compromise - more likely to work reliably than a watch on many people, and easy enough to keep charged up compared to the very low battery drain on a chest strap that it's not so inconvenient to have to recharge constantly. Even though my wrist sensor works 99.9% of the time on outdoor running, for some reason when on the treadmill I still get odd readings, so I've reverted to using the Polar OH1+ instead for those runs. Flawless. |
3 Feb
6:32pm, 3 Feb 2025
2,519 posts
|
Brunski
Good to hear @Windsor Wool, it's probably been my best value running purchase. I used to knacker out the chest straps pretty regularly.
|
3 Feb
6:46pm, 3 Feb 2025
27,964 posts
|
Bazoaxe
My polar chest strap is starting to play up and I was thinking about getting a new one. Maybe this is a sign
|
3 Feb
6:51pm, 3 Feb 2025
46,965 posts
|
SPR
I do still use a chest strap every so often (Garmin used to only detect LT via one at some point but not anymore) and for intervals it would likely be better in terms of responsiveness (I did a side by side test some time ago and there is a small optical lag) but the Polar Verity is just easier and the reality is I never raced with a chest strap after my first couple of years running because I didn't want to risk any distractions from issues mid race.
|
3 Feb
7:19pm, 3 Feb 2025
5,809 posts
|
J2R
I'm one of the fortunate ones who doesn't really have problems with chest straps such that I would need to be looking for alternatives, but I have heard very good things about the Polar arm straps. My understanding, though, is that you still need the electrical monitoring of a chest strap to get precise enough figures for useful tracking of heart rate variability. Please correct me if I'm wrong - it may now be the case that the optical heart rate monitoring in the latest arm straps has become good enough.
|
3 Feb
7:45pm, 3 Feb 2025
18,412 posts
|
jda
I don’t know about precision but there is no doubt that my garmin watch is quite capable of measuring stress (derived from HRV) fairly competently.
|
3 Feb
8:26pm, 3 Feb 2025
46,967 posts
|
SPR
Garmin can track HRV at rest well but HRV during exercise doesn't really work with optical in fact I'm not sure it's recorded at all anymore (checking my last chest strap run on runalyze I have it but not for arm band runs). Not seen much (anything?) about the usefulness of HRV during exercise though. Respiration may be another thing as well (believe this was previously why a chest strap was needed for LT). |
3 Feb
10:20pm, 3 Feb 2025
17,669 posts
|
Badger
This post got surprisingly long on me. Runalyze tells me that my Tickr Fit optical armband provides HRV, but the optical sensor in the watch does not. I took a look at the ANT+ data streams off a few devices over the weekend, sitting in front of the PC with an ANT USB receiver. It might perhaps change at higher heart rates, but the RR intervals the Tickr Fit was sending were precisely 60/pulse rate in every message. And when I say "precisely", 8 consecutive beats with a reported HR of 65, and for every one the reported RR interval was 0.92285156250 seconds, which is 60/65 to the precision of the data field (1/1024 second). I'll have a poke at the behaviour when running at some point, but that's going to be more fiddly to extract. Don't have an OH1 to test, do have a H10 and that shows intervals constantly changing and not exactly equal to 1/integer pulse rate, with one exception where the RR was duplicated, maybe because the HRM thinks it missed one and is filling in. I have a vague impression that my watch thinks my VO2max should be higher when I'm using the Tickr Fit. I don't think I'm going to wear two watches and two HRMs to test this, though, because I'm Just Not Committed Enough. |
3 Feb
10:32pm, 3 Feb 2025
46,968 posts
|
SPR
Interesting, the Verity Sense used to record HRV but it obviously wasn't correct so presumably Polar stopped it via an update.
|
3 Feb
10:35pm, 3 Feb 2025
46,969 posts
|
SPR
I had assumed the change was on the Garmin side till your post.
|
Related Threads
-
Daniels Running Formula. The Definitive Wire. Jul 2023
-
Jack daniels marathon plan help May 2014
-
Polarized training Feb 2025
-
Low Resting/ High Training Heart Rate Jan 2021
-
No limit to the benefits of exercise in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease Jan 2021
-
Resetting Max Heart Rate Dec 2020
-
Resting Heart Rate: Is it normal Oct 2020
-
Heart rate zones Jul 2020
-
Running Heart rate Jun 2020
-
Heart Rate monitors Jun 2020
Report This Content
You can report any content you believe to be unsafe. Please let me know why you believe this content is unsafe by choosing a category below.
Thank you for your report. The content will be assessed as soon as possible.