Heart rate
300 watchers
Oct 2017
5:37pm, 3 Oct 2017
11,839 posts
|
Chrisull
Yep, the article pretty much admits it's one size fits all is bunk, so it's a little strange that they proffer another one.
|
Oct 2017
10:32am, 5 Oct 2017
1,981 posts
|
steve45
I wonder whether the Africans use such tech gadgets today? Bet they don't and they run remarkably well. I know some truly amazing ultra runners who don't use any of the advanced tech we're talking about here (I'm not talking about mere "finishers"). It begs the question then : could these runners possibly be even better by using the tech? As for prediction DMZ (!)...quite unscientific (but followers will debate that!), Bio rhythms are said to predict where we will be at specific times of the month! And as for fatigue, I was very tired on my run this morning but I knew I was when I woke up at 4.30 am and then stayed up before running at 6am! No need to wonder what caused the fatigue there! All that aside, the science described by folks above is amazing and worth considering well. |
Oct 2017
11:08am, 5 Oct 2017
31,029 posts
|
GlennR
The Africans don't need to, it's all starts out with long distance, low intensity anyway, typically by running to school. It's us who are trying to squeeze the most we can out of limited training time who need the technology. |
Oct 2017
11:11am, 5 Oct 2017
31,031 posts
|
GlennR
Here's an article on the topic from Wired: wired.com |
Oct 2017
11:23am, 6 Oct 2017
1,984 posts
|
steve45
ah..I used to cycle hard and sometimes run to school so I'm ok!!! Thanks for the link Glenn. I ran well (for me) this morning even though it was pretty chilly at dawn. |
Oct 2017
12:28pm, 9 Oct 2017
758 posts
|
J2R
Interestingly, yesterday I managed to tap into that higher heart rate zone talked about a couple of pages back. I ran my best half marathon time for 2 years (and my 2nd fastest overall), at an average heart rate of 164, which is 93% of my HRmax. A better night's sleep than usual may have helped. It's still 2 bpm higher than my HR when I ran my PB 2 years ago, in a time 39 seconds faster. That may be because I hadn't fully shaken off a persistent lurgy yesterday, I don't know.
|
Oct 2017
1:56pm, 9 Oct 2017
1,992 posts
|
steve45
That's a heck of a time J2R.. minute faster than I've ever done one and that was when I was in my thirties. Even more "heck" (!) is that you are in that higher age group..and "heck heck" again to be able to sustain such an average HR is something I wish I could do. Brilliant running.
|
Oct 2017
2:34pm, 9 Oct 2017
506 posts
|
Brunski
That's fantastic running J2R!
|
Oct 2017
2:36pm, 9 Oct 2017
759 posts
|
J2R
Thanks, Steve. Yes, I always feel ability to sustain a high heart rate is a good marker of my current fitness level. The highest I've ever sustained over distance was when I was at my peak fitness in 2015, when I ran a half marathon on a reasonably hot (25C) summer's day without any cloud or shade, and my average HR was 165bpm. Didn't get a great time - my heart was presumably working too hard pumping blood to my skin to cool off - but did OK for the conditions.
|
Oct 2017
2:53pm, 9 Oct 2017
5,885 posts
|
Markymarkmark
Gosh J2R. I can't even begin to imagine 6m/m over more than 200 metres! Very impressive. |
Related Threads
- Daniels Running Formula. The Definitive Wire. Jul 2023
- Jack daniels marathon plan help May 2014
- Polarized training Apr 2024
- Low Resting/ High Training Heart Rate Jan 2021
- No limit to the benefits of exercise in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease Jan 2021
- Resetting Max Heart Rate Dec 2020
- Resting Heart Rate: Is it normal Oct 2020
- Heart rate zones Jul 2020
- Running Heart rate Jun 2020
- Heart Rate monitors Jun 2020