Sep 2011
12:17pm, 30 Sep 2011
17,176 posts
|
eL Bee!
(hill that is 20% gradient and 1 mile long!)
|
Sep 2011
12:19pm, 30 Sep 2011
44,407 posts
|
Gobi
Really Bee thanks for the suck eggs statement.
I am anal enough to run the same loops at the same speed so I can compare.
Did I really make an especially stupid comment this morning or something?
|
Sep 2011
12:19pm, 30 Sep 2011
963 posts
|
Jon_t
Thanks for your help, 6 weeks, I might go a bit mad by then!
|
Sep 2011
12:21pm, 30 Sep 2011
17,177 posts
|
eL Bee!
Sorry G - I'll fuck off back into my hole then
|
Sep 2011
12:25pm, 30 Sep 2011
44,409 posts
|
Gobi
Surely you Fuck off back back up a hill :¬)
|
Sep 2011
12:27pm, 30 Sep 2011
17,178 posts
|
eL Bee!
Yup - that too.
As a matter of interest I've been looking back at some cycling stats, and for the same AvHR over distances from 70-110 miles, I have a variance of 492 beats per mile to 630 beats per mile!
|
Sep 2011
12:29pm, 30 Sep 2011
1,841 posts
|
daviec
Absolutely.
That's just the maths teacher in me, lol. For info, you mean HR and pace are not directly proportional. If they were, that would indeed mean stopped = dead. For even more geekery, values in direct proportion DO have a linear relationship, but linear relationships do not imply direct proportionality.
I'm in quite a bumpy/hilly area so my runs tend to have lots of short to medium length up and downs, and so I just assume over the length of a run that these things will even out. Last night my HRM went haywire on a downhill and recorded 180+ for a good 1/4 mile, but didn't really affect the overall average for the 15 miles.
|
Sep 2011
12:29pm, 30 Sep 2011
44,410 posts
|
Gobi
Good effort I can produce some similar ALP type numbers :¬)
|
Sep 2011
12:30pm, 30 Sep 2011
1,842 posts
|
daviec
Oops. Took too long typing that reply, lol.
|
Sep 2011
12:33pm, 30 Sep 2011
44,411 posts
|
Gobi
Keep up Davie :¬)
|