Grammar pedants - help please.
1 lurker |
97 watchers
Sep 2007
10:22am, 25 Sep 2007
1,935 posts
|
Lyra OK
I knew I could rely on you lot. Must get my copy of 'Eats Shoots And Leaves' back, I miss that book. Hmm, statuses I think: en.wikipedia.org |
Sep 2007
10:22am, 25 Sep 2007
1,080 posts
|
Fat Dave
Mac - the idea that there is even such a thing as correct usage is actually relatively recent (last couple of hundred years or so)... and even that derived from books describing how the rich people already spoke, in an effort to allow social climbers to fit in, which eventually began to be viewed as "the rules". Until that time, for example, a double negative was commonly viewed as just a really big negative. Everything is permissible, it just depends on what's appropriate to get the desired response in your audience. Language is the currency of thoughts - but it's fiduciary issue. |
Sep 2007
10:26am, 25 Sep 2007
2,344 posts
|
Diogenes
It is just status isn't it?
|
Sep 2007
10:27am, 25 Sep 2007
9,914 posts
|
Hoaxster
Lord have mercy, it's the extended elipsis! - but it's [b]a[/b] fiduciary issue. *makes tea* |
Sep 2007
10:27am, 25 Sep 2007
4,785 posts
|
Maclennane
How can you have a plural of status? FD, whether recent or not, grammatical rules give shape to a language, allow intonation and inference and subtlety which would otherwise be lost. Besides those without a decent grip on grammar will never learn a foreign language half well, certainly not one like French which is more irregular than regular. |
Sep 2007
10:29am, 25 Sep 2007
2,345 posts
|
Diogenes
Ah, no, Huge was right. That's undermined my statuses as a grammar pedant and plodding dictionary. |
Sep 2007
10:29am, 25 Sep 2007
1,081 posts
|
Fat Dave
But they only have meaning when common to both the author and recipient. As long as they have common rules, they can be whatever you like. Grammar describes what language does. It doesn't define what it should do. |
Sep 2007
10:29am, 25 Sep 2007
10,269 posts
|
Hendo
This thread is giving me a semi-on.
|
Sep 2007
10:30am, 25 Sep 2007
1,082 posts
|
Fat Dave
TXT msging is a c8s in pnt. It's not ungrammatical, it's just a different kind of grammar. Innit. |
Sep 2007
10:30am, 25 Sep 2007
1,083 posts
|
Fat Dave
It's giving me a semi colon.
|
Related Threads
- Discovering you've been pronouncing a word wrong all your life Jul 2024
- Malapropism! Jun 2024
- Words of wisdom Jun 2023
- Proverbs that are obviously Bollocks Nov 2022
- Hidden Adventure Jun 2022
- RUNNERS WORLD RUN LESS RUN FASTER Jun 2022
- Alternative Dictionary Jul 2021
- Six Word Stories Feb 2021
- Does a Donkey like Strawberries Jan 2021
- Collective Nouns Jun 2020