Criteria for shoe reviews

3 watchers

Fleece and Dust Jul 2015 3:41pm, 14 Jul 2015 22,336 posts	0 Fleece and Dust As is expected mileage...
Hendo Jul 2015 5:09pm, 14 Jul 2015 29,185 posts	0 Hendo Are they blue.
fetcheveryone Jul 2015 5:17pm, 14 Jul 2015 16,193 posts	0 fetcheveryone And do they light up.
HappyG(rrr) Jul 2015 5:25pm, 14 Jul 2015 24,769 posts	0 HappyG(rrr) Sheesh, that was a heck of a meeting... right... Extras (e.g. extra laces, extra insoles - I got both of these with my Hoka Rapa Nuis, which I thought was really useful) Specialismness (shut up, it's a word!) - my X-talons are awesome on the rocks n mud, but horrid on tarmac, my Hokas are ace on rocks and road, but terrible on hilly grass and mud. Actually, thinking about it, almost no shoe can do everything. Hmmm. Agree with Flanker, a lot of it is subjective, but there will be room for comments so folk can read words beside the numbers. G
seratonin Jul 2015 7:15pm, 14 Jul 2015 882 posts	0 seratonin Some good comments made so far. I am with Fleecy, the expected mileage is a key factor though this tough to calculate...........
Kieren Jul 2015 11:05pm, 14 Jul 2015 3,773 posts	0 Kieren weight heel to toe drop
flanker Jul 2015 11:32pm, 14 Jul 2015 15,982 posts	0 flanker Happy - I'm fine in my x-talons on tarmac. I could quite happily run a road marathon in them (although it'd kill the studs!). Which I think illustrates the problem: they'll be so many conflicting views that it may leave the reader more confused than at the start.
flanker Jul 2015 11:32pm, 14 Jul 2015 15,983 posts	0 flanker or maybe I need a new glass that comes half full