Hi ,
It looks like you're using an ad blocker.



The revenue generated from the adverts on the site is a critical part of our funding - and it's because of these ads that I can offer the site for free. But using the site for free AND blocking the ads doesn't feel like a great thing to do, which is why this box is so large and inconvenient. Some sites will completely block your access, but I'm not doing that - I'm appealing to your good nature instead. Did you know that you can allow ads for specific sites, whilst still blocking them on others?

Thanks,
Ian Williams aka Fetch
or for an ad-free Fetcheveryone experience!

Cricket Thread

7 lurkers | 109 watchers
Jul 2013
2:35pm, 14 Jul 2013
980 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Goofee
I was only chewing my fingernails down as I'm a bit hungry...
Jul 2013
3:00pm, 14 Jul 2013
16,434 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
FenlandRunner
That was mighty close, not sure we (England) deserved it. But against the Aussies not complaining :-)
Jul 2013
3:43pm, 14 Jul 2013
1,923 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
postieboy
I was down the supermarket when we won, couldn't face watching that. I'm still recovering from 2005!

Finn has to be dropped for the Lord's test. He is bowling with no confidence and is a liability at the moment. Nearly cost us the match.
Jul 2013
4:08pm, 14 Jul 2013
981 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Goofee
He needs bounce in the wicket to be effective, that pitch just did not suit him at all. If Lord's is a better wicket there may well be a case for sticking with him.
Jul 2013
4:19pm, 14 Jul 2013
4,564 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Wriggling Snake
FInn is that sort of bowler, fast but can go for runs, a bit like Brett Lee. Lords is his home ground, and he bowls well there. I'd keep him, but I reckon hell get dropped, who would take hsi place, not Bresnan, maybe Tremlett.....
Jul 2013
4:21pm, 14 Jul 2013
24,612 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
swittle
Trust the technology?
Jul 2013
4:26pm, 14 Jul 2013
1,925 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
postieboy
If the first test squad is anything to go by, Onions if not Bresnan would be next in line. Tremlett hasn't set the world alight for Surrey this season so I suspect they are waiting for him to show some sustained form before recalling him.
Jul 2013
4:41pm, 14 Jul 2013
982 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Goofee
swittle: yes, I do trust the technology; what I'm not so certain about is the interpretation of the data presented by the technology and decisions made using the evidence.
Jul 2013
4:44pm, 14 Jul 2013
24,615 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
swittle
I see your point. So, if interpretation is open to human error, how is the game better off?

I'm sure this is a debate that's run for ages.....
Jul 2013
4:48pm, 14 Jul 2013
2,267 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Wobbling
Tremlett isn't considered fit enough for a 5 day game, yet.

I think the umps had a sho ker of a match and unless they sharpen up, this series will be remembered for controversial decisions and not how we and the Aussies played.

About This Thread

Maintained by GregP
  • Show full description...

Related Threads

  • cricket
  • sports








Back To Top

Tag A User

To tag a user, start typing their name here:
X

Free training & racing tools for runners, cyclists, swimmers & walkers.

Fetcheveryone lets you analyse your training, find races, plot routes, chat in our forum, get advice, play games - and more! Nothing is behind a paywall, and it'll stay that way thanks to our awesome community!
Get Started
Click here to join 114,069 Fetchies!
Already a Fetchie? Sign in here