Apr 2014
10:36am, 23 Apr 2014
947 posts
|
SillyFencer
Duh! Hadn't noticed that.
|
Apr 2014
10:37am, 23 Apr 2014
73,765 posts
|
GregP
~points and laughs~
|
Apr 2014
10:42am, 23 Apr 2014
4,481 posts
|
paul the builder
So, speaking of axes.... any chance of some numbers on the second / right y-axis? BPM specifically.
|
Apr 2014
10:52am, 23 Apr 2014
948 posts
|
SillyFencer
lol, thanks Greg.
|
Apr 2014
11:21am, 23 Apr 2014
2,022 posts
|
RevBarbaraG
Not sure if this is the right thread... but have noticed that the splits reported in the split breaker are not the same as the ones in the notes. E.g. my run today, the notes say:
1) 1m - 13:10 2) 1m - 13:00 3) 1m - 13:14 4) 1m - 13:30 5) 1m - 13:15
While according to the splitbreaker it was: 1) 13:28 2) 12:59 3) 13:25 4) 13:39 5) 13:29
Any idea, anyone?
|
Apr 2014
11:27am, 23 Apr 2014
950 posts
|
SillyFencer
I asked the same question rev. The first set are what your watch reported and saved. The second set are taken from the GPS data itself.
|
Apr 2014
5:36pm, 23 Apr 2014
73,768 posts
|
GregP
Try uploading it to Strava. They use a special algorithm involving tea leaves
|
May 2014
12:57pm, 27 May 2014
1,109 posts
|
SillyFencer
Hardly a big deal, but a tiny bit annoying. The "reset view" covers the exact bit I want to see on this occasion.
[IMAGE]
|
May 2014
11:05am, 28 May 2014
4,583 posts
|
paul the builder
Boing.
So, the axis-label-less graph, then?
1. The elevation (meters) is just a pretty picture unless there's actually some numbers on one of the y-axes. 2. HR (bpm) - just putting 70% and 85% 'zones' on there isn't really enough information to be useful. A line every 5bpm would be.
|
May 2014
11:27am, 28 May 2014
14,363 posts
|
fetcheveryone
SF - that's annoying - but hard to know where to put it really
PtB - the potential for so many axes means that it's difficult to find a solution that fits them all in, without eating up space. The tooltip is there when you mouse over the graph, and it gives you accurate readings for all the curves.
|