Oct 2021
7:01pm, 30 Oct 2021
7,202 posts
|
FenlandRunner
I my opinion Buttler was the difference. Getting the runs wins the T20. And he could have scored anything today. Absolutely engaged beast mode.
|
Oct 2021
7:06pm, 30 Oct 2021
28,436 posts
|
HellsBells
Here it is, though apparently it doesn’t take fielding into account so Woakes should arguably go up a bit for that catch
|
Oct 2021
7:07pm, 30 Oct 2021
7,203 posts
|
FenlandRunner
I feel a bit sorry for Buttler, that the Aussies didn't post a better score so he could have the time to get an unbeaten hundred.
|
Oct 2021
7:08pm, 30 Oct 2021
35,569 posts
|
SPR
Yeah so it's just looking at the runs he scored and that was in a no pressure situation.
|
Oct 2021
7:11pm, 30 Oct 2021
35,570 posts
|
SPR
I've just had a look at the info and it says there's a pressure index
|
Oct 2021
7:17pm, 30 Oct 2021
7,204 posts
|
FenlandRunner
Do you really think Buttler would bat any different? His stat's suggest otherwise. He is (nearly) always destructive in the initial six overs.
|
Oct 2021
7:21pm, 30 Oct 2021
35,571 posts
|
SPR
Doesn't really matter if he would or wouldn't. He doesn't always score this many runs and the bowlers meant that there was no risk whatsoever for him. He was playing with house money.
|
Oct 2021
7:22pm, 30 Oct 2021
7,207 posts
|
FenlandRunner
Yeah, yeah, yeah, he still did it. Everything else is if's and maybe's. I salute him.
|
Oct 2021
7:25pm, 30 Oct 2021
35,572 posts
|
SPR
You're the one saying ifs, buts, maybes. I'm talking about the specific match where the bowlers won the game at the halfway point.
|
Oct 2021
7:26pm, 30 Oct 2021
7,208 posts
|
FenlandRunner
No they didn't, the runs still needed to be scored. DUH!!!
|