Hi ,
It looks like you're using an ad blocker.



The revenue generated from the adverts on the site is a critical part of our funding - and it's because of these ads that I can offer the site for free. But using the site for free AND blocking the ads doesn't feel like a great thing to do, which is why this box is so large and inconvenient. Some sites will completely block your access, but I'm not doing that - I'm appealing to your good nature instead. Did you know that you can allow ads for specific sites, whilst still blocking them on others?

Thanks,
Ian Williams aka Fetch
or for an ad-free Fetcheveryone experience!

London Marathon Chip Timing Question

3 watchers
Apr 2017
10:20pm, 3 Apr 2017
43,312 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
swittle
RW thread about dodgy splits & times at VMLM 2016. Charity informed of sharp practice etc. etc.

forums.runnersworld.co.uk
Apr 2017
12:47am, 4 Apr 2017
6,001 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
The_Saint
The Rob Young story didn't get the full coverage here that it probably deserved, people attempting long distance records could learn a lot from reading that thread.
Apr 2017
12:47am, 4 Apr 2017
6,002 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
The_Saint
The Rob Young story didn't get the full coverage here that it probably deserved, people attempting long distance records could learn a lot from reading that thread.
Apr 2017
6:25pm, 28 Apr 2017
463 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Oranj
Someone on a another thread commented about the coverage in AW, and I bought a copy today, had a flick though. AW note on page 15 about the GB women that Rachel Cassidy of OUAC had a bit of a stormer - went from 3:13 to 2:38 and when I noticed her time on the day (searching for runners with "Oxford" in their club name) I thought it was pretty remarkable - I looked at her photos to see if I'd seen her running around town.

Lo and behold, on the VMLM web page today she's listed with a rather more ordinary 3:19 finishing time. I wonder what happened there? Somewhere in the past week they've updated her time. The splits for the 2:38 looked believable too. (I do notice that another (male) OUAC runner now has a 2:38 finishing time so I wonder if they swapped chips, unknowingly!)
Apr 2017
8:24pm, 28 Apr 2017
1,942 posts
  • Quote
  • Pin
Surrey Phil
Not in London but in one race, my chip didn't register over a particular mat. I guess that as I finished in just under 5 hours (halfway in just over 2 hours), no-one was going to bat an eyelid.

Got something to say?

To join the discussion, sign in or join us.

About This Thread

Maintained by The_Saint
Is it possible in principle to have a London finishing time on the Virgin London Marathon Results pa...
  • Show full description...

Related Threads

  • cheating
  • chip
  • events
  • london
  • marathon
  • timing








Back To Top

Tag A User

To tag a user, start typing their name here:
X

Free training & racing tools for runners, cyclists, swimmers & walkers.

Fetcheveryone lets you analyse your training, find races, plot routes, chat in our forum, get advice, play games - and more! Nothing is behind a paywall, and it'll stay that way thanks to our awesome community!
Get Started
Click here to join 114,034 Fetchies!
Already a Fetchie? Sign in here