Hadd's Approach To Distance Running
168 watchers
Oct 2009
7:03pm, 9 Oct 2009
794 posts
|
Skunk
just gone out and done10+ miles and tried going slow. ran on a hilly course at average 8:53m/m. Ive got to say im f**ked! Need to get a HRM to check out how im doing but i firmly believe i need to cut the speed and get the mileage up.
|
Oct 2009
7:05pm, 9 Oct 2009
13,362 posts
|
Dave A
Skunk: If you can follow the plan you will fly. You should have a good bit of fitness from the Tri *spits* stuff. And I seem to remember you were a bit nippy on the wing at Shaw Cross.
|
Oct 2009
7:06pm, 9 Oct 2009
13,363 posts
|
Dave A
Faster than me anyway, which wouldn't have taken much
|
Oct 2009
7:08pm, 9 Oct 2009
797 posts
|
Skunk
yeah i think i will but if you look at my mileage i really need to up it as its just not enough and i suppose this is a great way of doing it..
|
Oct 2009
7:09pm, 9 Oct 2009
798 posts
|
Skunk
(i was actually running away from you dave) ![]() |
Oct 2009
7:14pm, 9 Oct 2009
587 posts
|
chirunner
12 miles tomorrow at 130bpm HR - really slow for me.
|
Oct 2009
7:17pm, 9 Oct 2009
13,364 posts
|
Dave A
Howcome you stood next to me in the showers then Skunk?
|
Oct 2009
7:22pm, 9 Oct 2009
289 posts
|
P.E...
Boab as I understand (and I could be wrong here) the idea of the training is as you say base training (he goes further into his approaches on a letsrun I think of what to do once this intial phase is over). The idea being that there should be a good relationship between most of your times (indeed he does say you maybe be better at a certain distance). But with Joe he slowly uses the training to up his runs to 10 miles at 170 hr (somewhere between 88 and 89% of Joes HR max). Hadd see's this as Joe's desired Marathon HR. But he doesnt start running at that HR he starts the faster paced runs at 83% MHR until the pace is consistent you then up another level until the same happens. When Joe's pace at 88%MHR is steady he kinda suggests he is ready but then doesn't tell us how he got on! Maybe I shouldn't have called them marathon/tempo runs but my interpretation is that is basically what they are until I improve my HR to the next level, but yeah should have been clearer powerrunning.com - This link kinda disproves some of his theroies I think most schedules agree that running between 80-90% of MHR help with improvements (P&D for example) generally. |
Oct 2009
7:26pm, 9 Oct 2009
801 posts
|
Skunk
Dave - cos ive never seen anyone with 3 legs before...
|
Oct 2009
8:33pm, 9 Oct 2009
417 posts
|
IanRunner
I think the only theory he has which could be classed as debatable is his sub lacate runs. As most others advice training at your latate threshold, but even then Lydiard advises running at more than one aerobic pace. P.E I've read Powerrunning's opinions but they dont really prove that faster running has worked well for anyone at a top class level. Where as Hadds ideas are similar to Lydiard, who was very successful. |
Related Threads
-
Furman Institute of Running and Scientific Training (F.I.R.S.T.) acolytes! Sep 2023
-
Hillscore...what is it? Aug 2023
-
Daniels Running Formula. The Definitive Wire. Jul 2023
-
'Easy Interval Method' Feb 2023
-
POSE running Oct 2020
-
Numpty Question about Plans Feb 2020
-
Mcmillan training pace calculator Oct 2019
-
What's the point of pyramids? Sep 2017
-
Maffetone Jan 2017
-
Do I have to go so slow? Oct 2015