Heart rate
300 watchers
Oct 2010
2:30pm, 9 Oct 2010
2,085 posts
|
paul the builder
You need to input your resting and mx HR figures in to the training log here on Fetch, then it won't be "undefined" anymore. 70% of working Hr (or WHR, or heart rate reserve, HRR - all the same thing) is a good effort level to be sticking to for easy runs. Try to think of it as a ceiling for the run, not just to achieve it as an average figure. But - you'll need to verify what your max HR is in reality if you intend to stick at this. Formulae like 220 - age can be quite a few beats out, so it's worth doing a test. Painful but worth it - a speedwork session where you give the last couple of reps the absolute full kitchen sink, or a 5km race finished hard, or a sustained steep climb where you keep on pushing and pushing.... |
Oct 2010
4:33pm, 9 Oct 2010
4,704 posts
|
HellsBells
*possibly stupid question warning* I'm following the Parker book and finding it really, really difficult to keep HR low enough - indeed today I stopped, picked and ate a handful a blackberries whilst trying to get it down enough! Just about all my hydration during the day, and particularly before and after running, is tea. Could the caffeine be making a significant contribution to high HR readings? I really don't want to go through caffeine withdrawal if it's going to make sod all difference |
Oct 2010
5:16pm, 9 Oct 2010
28 posts
|
slowfish
cheers PTB, very helpful - I'll plug the resting and max HR figures into my log. Good to know my easy runs are run at about the right pace, it certainly feels very easy at 9mpm. Will definitely strap it on for my next speedwork session or 5k race - love the "absolute full kitchen sink" line!! Brilliant.
|
Oct 2010
5:23pm, 9 Oct 2010
2,367 posts
|
Belper Bear
I totally agree with PTB. According to the formula my MHR should be 169, in fact it's 191. If I used the formula, I could get over 70 % turning over in bed! |
Oct 2010
7:06pm, 9 Oct 2010
1,137 posts
|
GlennR
HellsBells, writing as a regular caffeine abuser I can assure you it makes no difference, certainly not past the first mile. You'll just find it a lot easier to keep your HR down once you've been doing this for a while.
|
Oct 2010
7:44pm, 9 Oct 2010
4,708 posts
|
HellsBells
thanks Glenn - thought it was probably immaterial good - decaff tea is horrid |
Oct 2010
7:48pm, 9 Oct 2010
1,860 posts
|
Jhuff
HB, It is just a matter of your running technique at slower speeds improving over time. I am likely to get scolded in here for bringing this up but you might find looking into improving your technique to accelerate your learning curve. Here is an article that you may find valuable: posetech.com |
Oct 2010
7:51pm, 9 Oct 2010
4,710 posts
|
HellsBells
Thanks Jhuff I'm already half converted and have the POSE book Got some help from a very nice man in St Neots too |
Oct 2010
9:52pm, 9 Oct 2010
12,242 posts
|
SPR™
My HR Strap hasn't worked well since I changed the battery, keep getting silly fluctuations and Max HRs on aerobic runs of 190-200 :-(. Anyone had problems with Boots batteries? Annoying not to have reliable stats to analyse. |
Oct 2010
10:36pm, 9 Oct 2010
5,512 posts
|
Meglet
I had trouble with mine and changing the battery didn't work. I tried several batteries too. Contacted Garmin and theybasically said it was f***ed. I've also linked spurious high readings with 100% polyester running tops, with the soft strap. |
Related Threads
- Daniels Running Formula. The Definitive Wire. Jul 2023
- Jack daniels marathon plan help May 2014
- Polarized training Apr 2024
- Low Resting/ High Training Heart Rate Jan 2021
- No limit to the benefits of exercise in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease Jan 2021
- Resetting Max Heart Rate Dec 2020
- Resting Heart Rate: Is it normal Oct 2020
- Heart rate zones Jul 2020
- Running Heart rate Jun 2020
- Heart Rate monitors Jun 2020