Oct 2010
3:49pm, 8 Oct 2010
1,132 posts
|
GlennR
Wouldn't you expect the final rep of a session like this to be very close Gobi? And how would a max test differ exactly?
|
Oct 2010
3:56pm, 8 Oct 2010
1,850 posts
|
Jhuff
Glenn,
You are just a panzy..lol
I was nauseous the other day on a tempo run but wasn't any where near maxhr levels.
|
Oct 2010
4:02pm, 8 Oct 2010
38,113 posts
|
Gobi
Very possible Glenn
MrH - have you ever bothered to do that Max test or is that number still your approximation ?
|
Oct 2010
4:05pm, 8 Oct 2010
1,133 posts
|
GlennR
Children, children, let it rest..;-)
|
Oct 2010
4:09pm, 8 Oct 2010
38,115 posts
|
Gobi
Glenn - it was actually just a genuine question, not really meant as provokative.
Jeremy - don't jump at the comment I just wanted to know
|
Oct 2010
4:19pm, 8 Oct 2010
12,225 posts
|
SPR™
Lol.
Glenn - you might be too knackered to reach the max.
|
Oct 2010
4:21pm, 8 Oct 2010
1,851 posts
|
Jhuff
Glenn,
I agree with Gobi. You should do a proper maxhr test if you want a test number. Sorry for being humorous
|
Oct 2010
4:24pm, 8 Oct 2010
1,852 posts
|
Jhuff
Glenn,
On the sessions performed I don't think you came as close to maxhr as you would ins proper test or at the end of a 5km race Sprint.
|
Oct 2010
4:27pm, 8 Oct 2010
1,134 posts
|
GlennR
J, in fact I now know you're right. Went back through my data and I hit 165 during the final uphill sprint of a 5k back in July, wearing suitable clothing, so it's not less than that.
|
Oct 2010
4:29pm, 8 Oct 2010
1,135 posts
|
GlennR
Wasn't at all bothered by the humour J.
|