Oct 2009
9:15pm, 10 Oct 2009
15 posts
|
No, my mighty jockanese friend
|
Oct 2009
9:15pm, 10 Oct 2009
5,618 posts
|
Boab
LOL, welcome back
|
Oct 2009
9:16pm, 10 Oct 2009
16 posts
|
Cheers me dears
|
Oct 2009
9:22pm, 10 Oct 2009
7,645 posts
|
SPR™
Boab, don't think they have to be race pace, depends what you are trying to achieve with them.
As for the running them at a pace you want rather than what you can, I think this is where the HRM can help, if you run faster but your overall HR is higher then you've just worked harder. I take my HR for each interval.
|
Oct 2009
9:28pm, 10 Oct 2009
17 posts
|
Intervals should be taken in the same way the Hadd gimmick is, as Boab et al pointed out. It isn't about banging them out as hard as you can or at a pace you want the end result to be, this achieves little to nothing or sends you into reverse. Everything is progressive overload. You train at the edge, you rest enough, the boundary advances, you take up the slack, repeat. This is how the body functions. The problem at the heart of the "grrrr" approach is one primarily of impatience on top of ignorance.
|
Oct 2009
9:32pm, 10 Oct 2009
8,529 posts
|
howdy, panda boy
|
Oct 2009
9:33pm, 10 Oct 2009
18 posts
|
It takes time, but the results are vast, lasting and infinite. I like Hadd's toothpaste tube analogy.
|
Oct 2009
9:43pm, 10 Oct 2009
7,646 posts
|
SPR™
Example from my log. 6 x 720m (approx) with 1:30 recovery.
Jan 15: ----------- 2.50 2.46 2.48 2.42 2.48 2.44 Total time 16:38 AHR per interval: 165, 174, 176, 180, 177, 177. AHR for intervals 175, AHR in recoveries 150
Feb 19------------- 2.40 2.41 2.39 2.37 2.38 2.38 Total time 15:53 AHR per interval: 170, 175, 175, 175, 178, 177. AHR in intervals 175, AHR in recoveries 149
Basically I know the pace improvement is all training not me pushing harder
|
Oct 2009
9:49pm, 10 Oct 2009
23 posts
|
What was that training for, and how did you honestly feel?
|
Oct 2009
9:50pm, 10 Oct 2009
24 posts
|
and this is the Hadd thread again, next person gets a slap lol
|