Cricket Thread

7 lurkers | 108 watchers
Aug 2020
10:47pm, 23 Aug 2020
11,297 posts
  •  
  • 0
rf_fozzy
I also have a feeling that he sort of wants to get to Murali's record...

Not sure exactly how many wickets/year he's on at the moment, but he's gone from 500-600 pretty quickly
Aug 2020
11:17pm, 23 Aug 2020
32 posts
  •  
  • 0
gambrinus
I think Anderson would have lamped the next person who dropped a catch. It was quite amusing to watch though.

Well batted, Azhar Ali. I had vague hopes of a Bannerman at one point, but the eternal wait continues.
Aug 2020
11:41pm, 23 Aug 2020
52,371 posts
  •  
  • 0
Diogenes
Dio”s prediction: England win by 9 wickets.

Pakistan dig in to establish a lead of about 20 or so. England, wary of the poor weather forecast, knock them off for the loss of 1 wicket with 4 on the board
Aug 2020
8:26am, 24 Aug 2020
685 posts
  •  
  • 0
Scorge
i'd be surprised if anderson went to australia next year. the last time courtney walsh toured there he was around 38 and pretty ineffective, albeit against a better batting unit. post anderson/broad england will have the same problem the windies had post ambrose/walsh i reckon.
SPR
Aug 2020
8:37am, 24 Aug 2020
31,027 posts
  •  
  • 0
SPR
If he's good enough (and he is ATM) why not?
Aug 2020
9:04am, 24 Aug 2020
21,749 posts
  •  
  • 0
TRO Saracen
I’d agree. Anderson has never been especially effective in Australia, and at 39/40 years old would be an utter liability.

I fear he will go, partly because we are too sentimental/weak/over impressed by stats and partly because no one else is really shoving him aside.

The Aussies will devour his used up carcass and it will be a humiliating end, bit like it was taking the completely shot Swann.
Aug 2020
10:22am, 24 Aug 2020
11,304 posts
  •  
  • 0
rf_fozzy
Let's use statistics instead of random personal opinions. Which are usually wrong.

James Anderson in Australia. Ashes 2017/18.

5 matches, 17 wickets @ 27.82, including a 5-43.

Easily the best of the bowlers on that tour. Broad and Woakes struggled.

It was 2013/14 he struggled with 14 wickets @ 44. Broad was the stand out pace bowler on that tour with 27 wickets at 27.5

2010/11 Ashes (the one England won) - Anderson 24 wickets at 26

The biggest problem in Australia is that usually *we don't score enough runs when batting*
Aug 2020
10:25am, 24 Aug 2020
11,305 posts
  •  
  • 0
rf_fozzy
There is an obsession with pace and only pace in this country (maybe because we have a history of not producing many *fast* bowlers).

Glenn McGrath
James Anderson
Courtney Walsh

All in and around that 81-82mph bracket. And are the 3 most successful pace bowlers in the history of test cricket in terms of # of wickets.

McGrath never had too much of a problem in Australia because "he wasn't fast enough"
Aug 2020
10:26am, 24 Aug 2020
21,750 posts
  •  
  • 0
TRO Saracen
Point accepted Foz, stats win out. I still think it’ll be a tour too far for him next time though. Think I tuned out for the terrible 17/18 tour so have the lingering impression from 13/14......
Aug 2020
10:30am, 24 Aug 2020
21,751 posts
  •  
  • 0
TRO Saracen
Re McGrath, Anderson and Walsh my impression is all started out fast (or at least much faster) and developed a full set of skills that compensated for a decline in pace and hence bowled deep into their 30s.

I certainly remember Anderson as the ‘Burnley Bullet’ in his first iteration.

About This Thread

Maintained by GregP

Related Threads

  • cricket
  • sports









Back To Top

Tag A User

To tag a user, start typing their name here:
X

Free training & racing tools for runners, cyclists, swimmers & walkers.

Fetcheveryone lets you analyse your training, find races, plot routes, chat in our forum, get advice, play games - and more! Nothing is behind a paywall, and it'll stay that way thanks to our awesome community!
Get Started
Click here to join 113,793 Fetchies!
Already a Fetchie? Sign in here